Creeperian annexation of Navidad and San Juan Diego
| ||
| ||
Location | Sequoyah | |
---|---|---|
Voting system | First-past-the-post | |
Arapaho | ||
Eastern Sequoyah | ||
New Austin | ||
Referendums are scheduled for 31 October 2022 in the Sequoyan provinces of Arapaho, Eastern Sequoyah, and New Austin which will determine wether Sequoyan territory will be annexed by Creeperopolis. The referendums were scheduled as a part of an agreement between the Creeperian and Sequoyan government to bring an end to the CODECO military occupation of the country, which had been ongoing since December 2020.
Within the Sequoyan ruling class and many Sequoyans not subject to potential annexation, the referendums were seen as a "necessary sacrifice" to bring an end to the country's military occupation and readmission to CODECO, and many Creeperans viewed them as a way to reunite with their ancestral homeland. Meanwhile, the vast majority of Sequoyans—both white and tribal—subject to potential annexation were strongly opposed to the referendums.
Both the Creeperian and Sequoyan government assured that the referendums were free, fair, and impartial, and that there was not any sort of foreign interference in the electoral process. Despite this, foreign political leaders and activists have condemned the referendums as "illegitimate" and as "imperialistic". Additionally, some foreign analysts questioned the legality of the referendums, viewing them as a violation of Sequoyah's sovereignty.
Background
Historical Creeperian territories
In 1431, a Creeperian military expedition commanded by Gonzalo Vázquez Luján established the city of San Juan (now known as San Juan Diego) along the coast of the Sequoyan Strait near the island of Susla. The foundation of the city, as well as the Captaincy General of San Juan, was a part of Creeperopolis' growing colonial ambitions which followed the voyages and landings of Cristóbal Colón Cámarillo in the San Carlos Islands in the 1380s which led to the establishment of a colony there.
Vázquez Luján attempted to convert the local population there to Creeperian Catholicism and trade with them, however, he disappeared in 1435 while on an expedition west which led to him being succeeded by Armando Rivera Obregón. Rivera Obregón's declaration as Vázquez Luján's successor caused tension with Vázquez Luján's son, José Vázquez Valladares, which led to the outbreak of a civil war which lasted from 1457 to 1460. The civil war significantly weakened the captaincy general, and the colony was ended in 1518 with the fall of San Juan to the Sequoyan Empire.
After the conquest of the Captaincy General of San Juan by the Sequoyan Empire, the city of San Juan Diego and the surrounding area became a part of the modern state of Sequoyah. Although both white and tribal Sequoyans settled in the former territory of the captaincy general, a large Creeperian diaspora remained, and they became a critical voting demographic upon the establishment of a Sequoyan republic, as the country's two largest political parties, the Federalist Party (NIP) and the Whig Party (GP) sought to gain the Creeperian vote in subsequent presidential and legislative elections throughout the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries. The region has also produced several prominent Sequoyan politicians of Creeperian descent, including two Sequoyan vice presidents: Ricardo Havana Guevera (1954–1966) and Ernesto Castro Aldana (2022–present).
CODECO military occupation
Template:Augustus Young series
On 5 December 2020, the Cooperation and Development Coalition (CODECO) launched a military invasion in Sequoyah following months of political instability and shortly after the beginning of the Sequoyan Civil War. CODECO installed Augustus Young as the country's provisional president.[1] Young declared an end to the war on 21 May 2021,[2] and new elections were held in May 2022. In the election, Young was elected as one of the country's co-president along with Rushing Waters.[3]
In his campaign, Young expressed his intention to attain Sequoyah's readmission to CODECO, as Sequoyah had originally been a member from April to May 2020 until it was evicted for legalizing slavery.[4][5] On 1 June 2022, the governments of Sequoyah and Creeperopolis came to an agreement which would lead to Sequoyah's readmission to CODECO and bring an end to the military occupation. A part of the agreement was that the territories administered by Creeperopolis in the Administrative Border Region (RAFSSE) would hold referendums to determine wether the provinces or parts of the provinces of Arapaho, Eastern Sequoyah, and New Austin desired annexation to Creeperopolis.[6]
Electoral process
The present Sequoyan provincial districts were used to determine which portions of the provinces of Arapaho, Eastern Sequoyah, and New Austin—the provinces that border Creeperopolis—would participate in the referendum. Ultimately, four of Arapaho's six districts, four of Eastern Sequoyah's fourteen districts, and two of New Austin's four districts were chosen as being eligible to participate. The remaining districts in the provinces were unaffected by the referendum. The decision for these specific districts was controversial, as it included Caprica, the capital city of New Austin, Marianton, the capital city of Arapaho, and San Juan Diego, Sequoyah's third largest city.
Residents of the districts were required to vote at designated polling stations in their district's capital city. Once the votes were tallied, the districts which voted in a majority to join Creeperopolis would be annexed, while those which voted in a majority to remain with Sequoyah would have not been annexed. Nicolás Correa Encarnación, the Creeperian minister of external affairs, stated, "If a district votes 50.01 percent against annexation, it will not be annexed; however, if a district votes 50.01 percent for annexation, it will be annexed".
Each referendum ballot contained one question—"Do you approve of annexation to the Holy Traditionalist Empire of Creeperopolis?"—which was written in both Sequoyan and Creeperian Spanish.[note 1] Below the question, the ballot had two options: "Yes" (for) and "No" (against). Voters had to select one of the options for their vote to be counted; blank ballots were discarded and did not contribute to the final percentage.
Party positions
Politically, the majority of Sequoyah's political parties and political leaders supported the referendum occurring, but differed on how the voters should vote. All of the legislature's opposition parties, consisting of left-leaning parties, urged voters to vote against annexation.[note 2] Meanwhile, the legislature's coalition parties, consisting of right-leaning parties, were divided on the issue: the Federalist Party urged voters to vote against annexation, the Creeperian League (LICRE) urged voters to vote for annexation, and the National Reconstruction Party (GAU) officially was neutral on the issue.
Choice | Parties | Political orientation | Leader | |
---|---|---|---|---|
For | Creeperian League | Romerism | Ernesto Castro Aldana | |
Against | Creeperian Progress Party | Progressivism | Matías Hidalgo Pérez | |
Federalist Party | Classical liberalism | Odysseus Stanford | ||
Restoration Party | Social democracy | Rushing Waters | ||
Union Party | Democratic socialism | Ulysses Lincoln | ||
United Socialist Federation | Socialism | Lee Nerys | ||
Whig Party | Isolationism | Frederick Tolliver | ||
Neutral | National Reconstruction Party | Conservatism | Augustus Young |
Outside of Sequoyah, the Creeperian Initiative (IC), the sole-legal political party in Creeperopolis, urged every Creeperian within Sequoyah to vote in favor of annexation. The party's leader, José Sáenz Morales, stated, "for 500 years, you have lived away from your home, and for centuries, you have yearned for your anticipated reunification with Creeperopolis", calling for Creeperans within Sequoyah to vote for annexation, which he described as "reunification" with Creeperopolis.[7]
Opinion polling
The tables below list opinion polling results divided by province in reverse chronological order, showing the most recent first and using the dates when the survey fieldwork was done, as opposed to the date of publication. Where the fieldwork dates are unknown, the date of publication is given instead. The highest percentage figure in each polling survey is displayed with its background shaded in the leading option's color. The "Lead" column on the right shows the percentage-point difference between the options in a poll. Unlike most polls conducted during Sequoyan elections, "Undecided" was not accepted as a valid option as per a governmental decree.
Most of the polling conducted occurred in Eastern Sequoyah, as the referendum there was expected to be close and contested. Most of the polls conducted since July 2022 resulted in a marginal difference of less than 10 percentage points. Polling was much less intensive in both Arapaho and New Austin, in part due to the difficulty of performing efficient polling in the two provinces, but also because the overwhelming majority of polls found that over 90 percent were against annexation and the polling firms felt it was unnecessary to conduct frequent polls as was occurring in Eastern Sequoyah.
Arapaho
Polling firm/Commissioner | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
For | Against | Lead | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arapaho referendum | 31 October 2022 | — | |||||
Navaja Briefing | 20 October 2022 | 1,448 | 2.6 | 97.4 | –94.8 | ||
Arapaho Times | 12 October 2022 | 1,582 | 4.5 | 95.5 | –91.0 | ||
Marianton Daily | 1–5 October 2022 | 1,793 | 3.3 | 96.7 | –93.4 | ||
Navaja Briefing | 30 September 2022 | 1,638 | 2.1 | 97.9 | –95.8 | ||
Freemont Express | 15 September 2022 | 1,638 | 5.2 | 94.8 | –89.4 | ||
Marianton Daily | 1 September 2022 | 1,258 | 5.2 | 94.8 | –89.4 | ||
Navaja Briefing | 20–26 August 2022 | 4,295 | 2.0 | 98.0 | –96.0 | ||
Arapaho Times | 15 August 2022 | 1,258 | 4.5 | 95.5 | –91.0 | ||
Arapaho Monthly | 1–2 August 2022 | 1,638 | 3.6 | 96.4 | –92.8 | ||
Marianton Daily | 1 August 2022 | 1,032 | 6.8 | 93.2 | –86.4 | ||
Navaja Briefing | 25–31 July 2022 | 3,552 | 1.4 | 98.6 | –97.2 | ||
Arapaho Times | 20 July 2022 | 1,385 | 4.7 | 95.3 | –90.6 | ||
Navaja Briefing | 11 July 2022 | 1,539 | 1.8 | 98.2 | –96.4 | ||
Marianton Daily | 5 July 2022 | 1,219 | 6.5 | 93.5 | –87.0 | ||
Arapaho Monthly | 20–30 June 2022 | 1,529 | 3.7 | 96.3 | –92.6 | ||
Arapaho Times | 22 June 2022 | 1,258 | 6.3 | 93.7 | –87.4 | ||
Marianton Daily | 15 June 2022 | 1,529 | 5.3 | 94.7 | –89.4 | ||
Navaja Briefing | 1–10 June 2022 | 4,638 | 2.1 | 97.9 | –95.8 | ||
Marianton Daily | 5 June 2022 | 1,529 | 7.6 | 92.4 | –84.8 | ||
Arapaho Times | 1–4 June 2022 | 1,638 | 8.2 | 91.8 | –83.6 |
Eastern Sequoyah
Polling firm/Commissioner | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
For | Against | Lead | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eastern Sequoyah referendum | 31 October 2022 | — | |||||
Eastern Sequoyah Gazzette | 22 October 2022 | 1,229 | 52.5 | 47.5 | +5.0 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 20 October 2022 | 1,853 | 51.9 | 48.1 | +3.8 | ||
Freemont Expositor | 17–18 October 2022 | 1,755 | 51.7 | 48.3 | +3.4 | ||
San Juan Diego Tribune | 14 October 2022 | 1,638 | 54.7 | 45.3 | +9.4 | ||
San Juan Diego Tribune | 10 October 2022 | 1,458 | 54.6 | 45.4 | +9.2 | ||
Eastern Sequoyah Gazzette | 5 October 2022 | 1,429 | 54.1 | 45.9 | +8.2 | ||
Eastern Sequoyah Gazzette | 3 October 2022 | 1,248 | 54.2 | 45.8 | +8.4 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 1 October 2022 | 1,569 | 54.0 | 46.0 | +8.0 | ||
El Pueblo Creeperiano | 27 September 2022 | 1,448 | 53.7 | 46.3 | +7.4 | ||
Freemont Expositor | 22 September 2022 | 1,448 | 52.3 | 47.7 | +4.6 | ||
San Juan Diego Tribune | 20 September 2022 | 1,358 | 52.6 | 47.4 | +5.2 | ||
El Pueblo Creeperiano | 15 September 2022 | 1,429 | 54.3 | 45.7 | +8.6 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 13 September 2022 | 2,191 | 52.1 | 47.9 | +4.2 | ||
Eastern Sequoyah Gazzette | 8 September 2022 | 3,558 | 51.0 | 49.0 | +2.0 | ||
Eastern Sequoyah Gazzette | 1–3 September 2022 | 3,421 | 51.1 | 48.9 | +2.2 | ||
San Juan Diego Tribune | 1 September 2022 | 1,853 | 49.0 | 51.0 | –2.0 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 25 August 2022 | 1,429 | 51.4 | 48.6 | +2.8 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 22 August 2022 | 1,428 | 50.4 | 49.6 | +0.8 | ||
El Pueblo Creeperiano | 20 August 2022 | 1,528 | 52.4 | 47.6 | +4.8 | ||
Eastern Sequoyah Gazzette | 18 August 2022 | 1,329 | 52.8 | 47.2 | +5.6 | ||
El Pueblo Creeperiano | 15 August 2022 | 1,558 | 53.8 | 46.2 | +7.6 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 10 August 2022 | 1,248 | 53.5 | 46.5 | +7.0 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 8 August 2022 | 1,357 | 53.6 | 46.4 | +7.2 | ||
San Juan Diego Tribune | 4 August 2022 | 1,049 | 51.5 | 48.5 | +3.0 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 1 August 2022 | 1,538 | 51.2 | 48.8 | +2.4 | ||
Freemont Expositor | 31 July 2022 | 2,568 | 50.6 | 49.4 | +1.2 | ||
Eastern Sequoyah Gazzette | 26 July 2022 | 1,220 | 49.0 | 51.0 | –2.0 | ||
Freemont Expositor | 23–24 July 2022 | 2,568 | 48.4 | 51.6 | –3.2 | ||
El Pueblo Creeperiano | 22 July 2022 | 1,538 | 51.6 | 48.4 | +2.8 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 20 July 2022 | 1,218 | 51.2 | 48.8 | +2.4 | ||
Eastern Sequoyah Gazzette | 17 July 2022 | 1,700 | 48.5 | 51.5 | –3.0 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 13 July 2022 | 1,468 | 50.5 | 49.5 | +1.0 | ||
San Juan Diego Tribune | 11 July 2022 | 1,430 | 47.2 | 52.8 | –5.6 | ||
El Pueblo Creeperiano | 10–11 July 2022 | 2,310 | 55.3 | 44.7 | +10.6 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 9 July 2022 | 1,810 | 51.0 | 49.0 | +2.0 | ||
Eastern Sequoyah Gazzette | 7 July 2022 | 1,202 | 48.2 | 51.8 | –3.6 | ||
El Pueblo Creeperiano | 5 July 2022 | 1,285 | 50.5 | 49.5 | +1.0 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 2 July 2022 | 1,623 | 50.8 | 49.2 | +1.6 | ||
San Juan Diego Tribune | 1 July 2022 | 1,538 | 50.5 | 49.5 | +1.0 | ||
San Juan Diego Tribune | 29 June 2022 | 1,320 | 50.4 | 49.6 | +0.8 | ||
Eastern Sequoyah Gazzette | 27 June 2022 | 1,452 | 49.2 | 50.8 | –1.6 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 24 June 2022 | 1,539 | 50.1 | 49.9 | +0.2 | ||
San Juan Diego Tribune | 20 June 2022 | 1,149 | 49.3 | 50.7 | –1.4 | ||
El Pueblo Creeperiano | 18 June 2022 | 2,539 | 52.7 | 47.3 | +5.4 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 13 June 2022 | 1,429 | 46.4 | 53.6 | –7.2 | ||
Freemont Expositor | 10 June 2022 | 1,044 | 43.6 | 56.4 | –12.8 | ||
El Pueblo Creeperiano | 7 June 2022 | 1,649 | 40.4 | 59.6 | –19.2 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 6 June 2022 | 1,538 | 42.5 | 57.5 | –15.0 | ||
Tiempos de San Juan Diego | 1–4 June 2022 | 1,764 | 47.1 | 52.9 | –5.8 |
New Austin
Polling firm/Commissioner | Fieldwork date | Sample size |
For | Against | Lead | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
New Austin referendum | 31 October 2022 | — | |||||
Caprica Gazzette | 21 October 2022 | 1,279 | 3.9 | 96.1 | –92.2 | ||
Caprica Gazzette | 15 October 2022 | 1,429 | 4.0 | 96.0 | –92.0 | ||
New Austin Magazine | 1–10 October 2022 | 3,568 | 3.7 | 96.3 | –92.6 | ||
Caprica Gazzette | 30 September 2022 | 1,428 | 4.0 | 96.0 | –92.0 | ||
Caprica Gazzette | 15 September 2022 | 1,294 | 6.5 | 93.5 | –87.0 | ||
Caprica Gazzette | 20–30 August 2022 | 3,552 | 3.9 | 96.1 | –92.2 | ||
New Austin Magazine | 7–12 August 2022 | 2,4329 | 5.3 | 94.7 | –89.4 | ||
Caprica Gazzette | 25–31 July 2022 | 2,568 | 4.0 | 96.0 | –92.0 | ||
Caprica Gazzette | 25–30 June 2022 | 2,578 | 5.0 | 95.0 | –90.0 | ||
New Austin Magazine | 15 June 2022 | 1,560 | 4.8 | 95.2 | –90.4 | ||
Caprica Gazzette | 1–4 June 2022 | 1,786 | 8.0 | 92.0 | –84.0 |
Results
Arapaho districts
Overall results
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
Marianton District
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
Windy Peaks District
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
Cedarton District
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
Gallivan District
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
Eastern Sequoyah districts
Overall results
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
San Juan Diego District
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
Ephraim District
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
New Laurent 4
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
New Austin districts
Overall results
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
Caprica District
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
Gowentown District
Option | Votes | % | |
---|---|---|---|
Yes | |||
No | |||
Total | |||
Reactions
- International reactions
- El Salvador: On 2 June 2022, Orlando Pareja Palau, the president, of El Salvador stated that he disagreed with the referendums occurring, stating, "referendums are an inherently democratic process, and the democratic system has time and time again proven to be a disaster for humanity". Pareja Palau is an outspoken opponent of democracy, and he called on Creeperopolis to negate the referendum, and instead unilaterally annex any Sequoyan territory which possessed a Creeperian majority population, calling it the only "fair and sensible solution".[8]
- Tirol: On 2 June 2022, Marcus Garder, the minister of foreign affairs of Tirol stated he was "deeply concerned" Creeperian government's decision to authorize referenda on the territorial integrity of Sequoyah. He further added, "This action is a potentially grave threat to the sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of the state. We condemn any act of aggression against Sequoyah's national sovereignty, and the right of the Sequoyan people to a state".[9]
See also
Terraconserva portal |
- 1839 annexation of Senvar
- 1949 Atlántidan annexation referendum
- 1949 Castillianan annexation referendum
Notes
- ↑ Sequoyan: ᎿᏛᎦ ᏂᎯ ᎪᎯᏳᏙᏗ ᎠᏕᎳᏗᏍᏗ ᎦᎸᏉᏗᏳ ᎧᏃᎮᎸᎯ ᏙᏱᏗᏢᎦᏚᎲ ᎤᏍᏗᎤᏪᏴᎦᏚᎲᎢ?; Creeperian Spanish: ¿Ապրեuբաս ա լա'աnեխիօn ալ Սանտո Իմպերիո Տրադիծիոնալիստա դե Ծրեեպերօպոլիս?
- ↑ The Creeperian Progress Party (PPC) officially supported the "against" option, however, a minority of members voiced support for the "for" option, stating that unification with the Creeperian homeland was more important than the ideological differences the party had with the Creeperian government.
References
- ↑ Cabañeras Gutiérrez, Augusto Ramón (5 December 2020). "Promesa, Progresso, Prosperidad, y Paz" [Promise, Progress, Prosperity, and Peace]. Ministry of Defense (in Creeperian Spanish). San Salvador, Creeperopolis. Retrieved 22 March 2022.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ Young, Augustus Juniper (21 May 2021). "ᎦᎶᏂ ᎣᏂᎡᎯ ᎠᏲᎵ ᎤᏁᏨᎩ ᎠᏓᏎᎪᎩᏍᏗ ᎦᏬᎯᎸᏙᏗ ᎤᏌᎯᎸᏥᏌᎠᎦᏛᏅ ᏍᏏᏉᏯ ᎠᏓᏅ ᏓᏄᏩ" [Augustus Juniper Young Declares Victory Over Calhounists in the Sequoyan Civil War]. Government of Sequoyah (in Sequoyan). Freemont, Sequoyah. Retrieved 22 March 2022.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ Sequoyan Election Commission (1 May 2022). "2022 ᏍᏏᏉᏯ ᎤᎬᏫᏳᎯ ᏗᏙᎩᏯᏍᏗ ᏄᎵᏍᏔᏅ" [2022 Sequoyan Presidential Election Results]. Government of Sequoyah (in Sequoyan). Freemont, Sequoyah. Retrieved 1 May 2022.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ Franco Rodríguez, Carlos Jorge (19 April 2020). "Soldados Secoyaneros Empiezan Operaciones Junto conel Ejército Creeperiano" [Sequoyan Soldiers Begin Joint-Operations with the Creeperian Army]. Gaceta Creeperiano (in Creeperian Spanish). San Salvador, Creeperopolis. Retrieved 22 March 2022.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ Franco Rodríguez, Carlos Jorge (2 May 2020). "Batallón Secoyanero de Voluntares Arrestado en Creeperópolis por'la Legalización del Esclavitud porel Gobierno de Secoya" [Sequoyan Volunteer Battalion Arrested in Creeperopolis due to the Sequoyan Government's Legalization of Slavery]. Gaceta Creeperiano (in Creeperian Spanish). San Salvador, Creeperopolis. Retrieved 22 March 2022.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ Correa Encarnación, Nicolás Adolfo (1 June 2022). "Ծոնվենիո դել 1 դե Ջփնիո" [1 June Agreement]. Ministry of External Affairs of Creeperopolis (in Creeperian Spanish). Freemont, Sequoyah. Retrieved 20 October 2022.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ Sáenz Morales, José Antonio (22 October 2022). "Փն Մենսաջե Ոֆիծիալ դե լա'Ինիծիատիվա Րեալ Ծատօլիծո Ծրեեպերիանո Նածիոնալիստա յ լա'Ֆրենտե Պրո-Պատրիա դե Փնիֆիծածիօն են լա'Րեֆերէնդփմ են Սեծոյա" [An Official Statement from the Nationalist Creeperian Catholic Royal Initiative and the Pro-Fatherland Front of Unification on the Upcoming Referendum in Sequoyah]. Creeperian Initiative (in Creeperian Spanish). San Salvador, Creeperopolis. Retrieved 22 October 2022.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ Pareja Palau, Orlando Óscar (2 June 2022). "Estat Oficial de la República Imperial d'El Salvador Sobre Sequoyah i l'Acord de l'1 de Juny" [Official State of the Imperial Republic of El Salvador Regarding Sequoyah and the 1 June Agreement]. Government of El Salvador (in Salvadoran Spanish). Ciutat dels Àngels, El Salvador. Retrieved 22 October 2022.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ Garder, Marcus (2 June 2022). "Ministèr dela Cossa Straurdener d'Tirol – Palavra su Eleziõn a Séquoie" [Tiroler Ministry of Foreign Affairs – Statement on Referenda in Sequoyah]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Tirol (in Ladin). Innsbruck, Tirol. Retrieved 22 October 2022.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
External links
Media related to Sequoyah at LCN Wiki |
Media related to Elections at LCN Wiki |
- CS1 maint: unrecognized language
- Articles with short description
- Good articles
- Use dmy dates from October 2022
- Use Jackian from October 2022
- All LCNWiki articles written in Jackian
- Pages using bar box without float left or float right
- Pages with broken file links
- Creeperopolis
- Creeperopolis RP
- Creeperopolis Terraconserva
- Terraconserva
- Sequoyah
- Election
- Controversial Election