2019 Salvadoran presidential election
| |||
Opinion polls | |||
Registered | 10,519,708 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Reporting | 46.22% | ||
Map of El Salvador's departments and municipalities. | |||
|
The November 2020 Salvadoran presidential election is an upcoming election in El Salvador that will elect a new President of El Salvador. The election is occuring at the same time as legislative elections in the country. The election is nullifying the questionable results of the previous presidential election in April 2020 that elected Alexander Giammattei Falla as President.
In the election, only the Creeperian Initiative was allowed to run candidates as per the Ciudad Los'Ángeles Agreement. The Initiative selected Orlando Pareja Palau, Santiago Morales Cabrera, and César Castillo Reyes as its three candidates to run in the election. Pareja Palau is a Creeperian professor while Morales Cabrera and Castillo Reyes are Creeperian politicians; Morales Cabrera is an incumbent Mayor while Castillo Reyes is a former Mayor.
The winner of the election is scheduled to be innaugurated on 1 January 2021. Incumbent President Giammattei Falla will continue to serve as President until said date. The Central Election Commission for El Salvador and the government of Creeperopolis are officially monitoring the election to prevent electoral fraud or rigging.
Contents
Background
Presidential elections occured in El Salvador in November 2019. In the election, former President Adán Tamayo Navarro was declared to have been the winner. He was sworn in on 1 January 2020. On 14 January, a series of protests errupted in Ciudad Los'Ángeles over Tamayo Navarro and his predecessor, Armando Calderón Sol, allowing the National Intelligence Directorate (DINA) to reenter the country following the declaration of martial law in August 2019.[1][2] Tamayo Navarro was assassinated only 16 days into his term on 16 January.[3] He was replaced by his Vice President, Alexander Giammattei Falla.[3] The change in leadership appeased most moderate protestors who only sought a change in government since Tamayo Navarro was a part of a political dynasty that had ruled El Salvador since 1980.[3] However, there were radical protestors who continued to oppose the new government of Giammattei Falla and continued to protest, even demanding full independence from Creeperopolis.[3] Giammattei Falla declared a state of emergency on 19 January.[4] In his declaration, he formally requested the Creeperian Armed Forces to enter El Salvador and put down the radical protestors.[4] The action was approved of by the moderate protestors who were satisfied with the regime change.[4] The Creeperian government gave the protestors until midnight on 21 January to cease protesting and the violence mostly ended by 31 January, but sporadic demonstrations continued following 31 January.[5][6][7]
On 9 April 2020, Giammattei Falla called for a snap election for 12 April to appease the protestors.[8] The protestors demanded a foreign nation should monitor the elections for fairness.[8] Six candidates were declared, four of whom were from the Creeperian Initiative and one of them was Giammattei Falla.[8] The election was postponed to 19 April since no international observer had been declared.[9] It was again postponed on 19 April for the same reason.[10] The Creeperian government official requested the government of Lyoa to be the international monitor for the election to which Lyoa agreed.[10][11] The election occured as planned on 26 April but the results were not released until 7 May when Giammattei Falla was declared the winner.[12] The results were seen as rigged and the protests continued.[citation needed]
Ciudad Los'Ángeles Agreement
On 7 October, the government of El Salvador and the radical protestors came to a final agreement after negotiations ended. The terms of the agreement, the Ciudad Los'Ángeles Agreement, were as follow:[13]
- A new constitution for El Salvador[13]
- The establishment of a legislature, the Legislative Assembly[13]
- The establishment of 2 opposition political parties, the Salvadoran Pro-Fatherland Front and the Salvadoran Popular Movement[13]
- The implementation of biannual legislative elections[13]
- The implementation of presidential elections every 3 years[13]
The factions also agreed that three political parties would exist: the Creeperian Initiative, the Salvadoran Pro-Fatherland Front, and the Salvadoran Popular Movement.[13] The three agreed that only the Creeperian Initiative could run candidates in the presidential elections and that only the Salvadoran Pro-Fatherland Front and the Salvadoran Popular Movement could run candidates in the legislative election.[13]
The government and protestors agreed to hold the elections on 1 November 2020 in the form as a general election. 1 November was to be set as the date for all future elections as it had been in the past.[13] The results of the previous election in April 2020 were agreed to be cancelled. Giammattei Falla agreed to continue serving as President until 1 January 2021 when the new President would take over.[13] He also agreed to not run for reelection.[13]
The new constitution would prohibit people from holding the office of President for two consecutive terms, just like the then current constitution did.[13] The constitution would also set the seat count of the Legislative Assembly at 111, each representing one legislative district in El Salvador.[13]
The Creeperian Initiative announced its candidates shortly after the signing of the agreements.[13] The Salvadoran Pro-Fatherland Front and the Salvadoran Popular Movement began campaigning in each of the 111 districts to earn seats for the first session of the new legislature.[13][14]
Nominations
Orlando Pareja Palau
| ||
---|---|---|
Political offices
Elections
Personal life
Published works
|
||
1st Creeperian Initiative ticket | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Orlando Pareja Palau | Antonio Ulloa Garay | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
for President | for Vice President | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Political Science Professor at Antonio Sáenz Heredia University (1998–present) |
17th Mayor of El Congo (2011–2019) |
The first nomination for President put forth by the Creeperian Initiative is Orlando Óscar Pareja Palau (b. 24 July 1974), a professor of political science at the Antonio José Sáenz Heredia University in San Romero, Creeperopolis.[14] He graduated from the university he teaches at in 1998 and joined the Initiaitve the same year. Pareja Palau is well-known for his publications such as La'Liberación del Gran Sacramento, a 2007 islamophobic and homophobic historical fiction novel about a Creeperian crusade into Greater Sacramento, and Historia de Catolicismo, a 1998 islamophobic report that promotes the conspiracy theory of the "Jewish Holocaust". Pareja Palau is partly responsible for the spread of the conspiracy theory across Creeperopolis and he is also partly responsible for the mass spread of Malgaphobia across Creeperopolis in late 2019.[citation needed] He is also notorious for refusing to accept the figures of Deltinians and homosexuals in the De-Catholization, a Creeperian Civil War-era genocide perpatrated by the National Council for Peace and Order from 1933 to 1949, in his 2013 report La'De-Catolización.
Pareja Palau's running mate is Antonio Ulloa Garay (b. 18 October 1973), the former Mayor of El Congo from 2011 to 2019. He graduated from the University of Ciudad Los'Ángeles in 1999 and became a lawyer and joined the Initiaitve in 2003. Ulloa Garay was chosen by then President Manuel Arboleda Guillén to be the Mayor of El Congo in 2011. He resigned as Mayor in 2019 and returned to being a lawyer.
The Pareja Palau–Ulloa Garay campaign released the following agenda for their campaign:
- Take a larger in the Cooperation and Development Coalition (CODECO)
- Spread awarness of the "Jewish Holocaust" in El Salvador
- Attract investors from Quebecshire
- Invest in the tourism market
- Redevelop the infrastructe of cities on the Granada River
- Establish a Salvadoran division of the National Intelligence Directorate
- Allow National Coffee and Sugar Corporation (CORNACA) investment in El Salvador
- Militarization of the Salvadoran National Police
- Establish automatic death penalty for membership in Mara Salvatrucha
Santiago Morales Cabrera
2nd Creeperian Initiative ticket | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Santiago Morales Cabrera | Ernesto Cabrera Franco | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
for President | for Vice President | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43rd Mayor of Santa Ana (2006–present) |
Law Professor at University of Ciudad Los'Ángeles (2013–present) |
The second nomination for President put forth by the Creeperian Initiative is Santiago Hernán Morales Cabrera (b. 16 September 1969), the incumbent mayor of Santa Ana in Santa Ana, Creeperopolis.[14] He graduated from the University of Santa Ana in 1991 and joined the Initiaitve the same year. Morales Cabrera became mayor of Santa Ana in 2006.
Morales Cabrera's running mate is Ernesto Cabrera Franco (b. 19 June 1972), a law professor at the University of Ciudad Los'Ángeles. He graduated from that university in 1996.
The Morales Cabrera–Cabrera Franco campaign released the following agenda for their campaign:
- Construct a high speed rail line from Ciudad Los'Ángeles to El Congo
- Renovate Rafael Campo Pomar International Airport
- Attract investors from Greater Sacramento
- Establish a National Welfare Initiative
- Change the flag, motto, and anthem to Salvadoran Spanish
- Allow National Mining and Smelting Corporation (CORNAMIF) investment in El Salvador
- Pass reforms of the Salvadoran National Police
- Establish a Salvadoran division of the National Intelligence Directorate
- Place limitations and restrictions on the death penalty
César Castillo Reyes
3rd Creeperian Initiative ticket | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
César Castillo Reyes | Ramiro León Carpio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
for President | for Vice President | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11th Mayor of Sonsonate (2004–2018) |
Political Science Professor at University of Ciudad Los'Ángeles (2011–present) |
The third nomination for President put forth by the Creeperian Initiative is César Romero Castillo Reyes (b. 14 October 1970), the former mayor of Sonsonate in Sonsonate, Creeperopolis.[14] He graduated from the University of Sonsonate in 1992 and joined the Initiaitve the in 1993. Castillo Reyes became mayor of Santa Ana in 2004 and resigned in 2018.
Castillo Reyes's running mate is Ramiro León Carpio (b. 3 March 1974), a political science professor at the University of Ciudad Los'Ángeles. He graduated from that university in 1996.
The Castillo Reyes–León Carpio campaign released the following agenda for their campaign:
- Establish local elections
- Invest in the tourism market
- Attract investors from Eminople
- Allow United Creeperian Banana Company (EMUPLAC) investment in El Salvador
- Negotiate the reestablishment of the Salvadoran Army
- Reform the national education system
- Reduce conscription in the Creeperian Army from 4 to 2 years
- Subsidize the agricultural sector of northern El Salvador
- Transition from coal power to hydroelectricity
Endorsements
Santiago Morales Cabrera |
---|
Salvadoran politicians
Foreign politicians
Organizations Notable individuals
|
César Castillo Reyes |
---|
Salvadoran politicians
Foreign politicians
Organizations Notable individuals
|
Foreign involvement
The Creeperian government will be overseeing and monitoring the election for transparency and to ensure there will be no voter fraud or election rigging.
Notable expressions, phrases, and statements
- El Salvador First – Stated by Pareja Palau in the first debate, the phrase implies that he will put the interests of El Salvador before any other international interests.[15]
- Hating Malgers is not racist. – Said by Morales Cabrera during the first debate, the phrase states that hating Malgans is not inherently racist. The term "Malger," a Malgaphobic racial slur, was used instead of the proper demonym, "Malgan."[15]
- Malgerbeshia – Said by both Pareja Palau and Morales Cabrera during the first debate, the term is a mix of the racial slur "Malger" and the international organization known as Aurebeshia. The term implies Malgax controls the organization.[15]
- Malger World Order or Malger–Squg World Order – A conspiracy theory pushed for by Pareja Palau and Morales Cabrera during the first debate that states that Malgax, and in some instances, Sequoyah, control the entire world from behind the scenes. Typically, it is refered to as the "Malgan(-Sequoyan) World Order," but the candidates used the racial slurs "Malger" and "Squg" in place of Malgan and Sequoyan.[15]
- You can think that. – A phrase allegedly said by Pareja Palau in the first debate, the phrase was allegedly said in response to the debate moderator telling him "your chances at being elected are at the will of the voters."[15][better source needed] Pareja Palau denied making the remark and stated that it was "Malgan propaganda." Most international sources, most notably the Quebecshirite Broadcasting Corporation, confirmed that he did in fact make the statement.[15]
Debates
Presidential debates were scheduled for 10 October, 17 October, and 24 October. Each candidate was supposed to attend two of the three debates, however, Morales Cabrera and Pareja Palau only attended one, while Castillo Reyes attended zero.
November 2020 Salvadoran presidential election debates in El Salvador | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Organizers | Location | Viewing figures (millions) |
P Present S Surrogate NI Not invited A Absent R Invite rescinded I Invited N No debate | |||||||||||||
IC | IC | IC | |||||||||||||||
10 October | Gaceta Creeperiano[a]
Broadcasted on: Canal Dos Moderated by: Carlos Franco Rodríguez |
University of Ciudad Los'Ángeles, Ciudad Los'Ángeles, El Salvador |
1.32 | P Pareja Palau |
P Morales Cabrera |
NI Castillo Reyes | |||||||||||
Broadcasted on: Canal Doce
|
Ciudad Los'Ángeles, El Salvador |
NI Pareja Palau |
N Morales Cabrera |
N Castillo Reyes | |||||||||||||
Broadcasted on: Canal Diez
|
Ciudad Los'Ángeles, El Salvador |
N Pareja Palau |
NI Morales Cabrera |
R Castillo Reyes |
First debate
The first debate occured in Ciudad Los'Ángeles on 10 October. It was hosted by the Gaceta Creeperiano and was broadcasted on Channel Two inside El Salvador and Creeperopolis. It was also broadcasted by Poste du Port in Puerto Francisco and the Quebecshirite Broadcasting Corporation in Quebecshire.[16] The Quebecshirite broadcasters translated the debate into Quebecshirite for their audiences.[16] Terranilian National News broadcasted it in Terranihil. Pareja Palau and Morales Cabrera took part in the debate.
The debate began with by Morales Cabrera taking a moment to outline his goals for a lot of internal reform and "building alongside that" such as rail improvements from Ciudad Los'Ángeles to El Congo and a renovation of the Rafael Campo Pomar International Airport. He stated his desire for international investments in El Salvador stating he wants to "[i]mprov[e] El Salvador itself while maintaining [the] benefits we already have." Pareja Palau began his opening statement by stating that his campaign was about "Salvadorans above all else with Creeperans second." He focused on Salvadoran economy and the Cooperation and Development Coalition in his opening statement, specifying that he wants El Salvador to take a larger role in international trade. He wants heavy invetsment into tourism and mentioned specific spots to focus on for tourists such as the Trial of Flowers in Ciudad Los'Ángeles and the Piedras Gordas Waterfall.
The moderator, Carlos Franco Rodríguez of the Gaceta Creeperiano, presented four general and introduction questions to each candidate. The first was what each candidate believed was the most important issue the country sould address. Morales Cabrera said that the single most important issue was infastructural development and that most of his agenda was about infastructure, economy, domestic development, and innovation. He wanted to link all major cities with railroads and institute a "National Welfare Initiative." Pareja Palau stated that the most important issue was dealing with the National Intelligence Directorate presence in El Salvador. He stated that since January, people had been protesting its return since the 1956 agreement to leave, yet the DINA returned in August 2019. He stated that the first thing he would do in office would be to negotiate with the Creeperian government to have the DINA leave El Salvador or to establish Salvadoran-run DINA in the country. The second question was what the candidates would do in their first 100 days in office. Morales Cabrera stated that his first 100 days would be about the construction of a high speed railroad from Ciudad Los'Ángeles to El Congo as well as sending funds to the Rafael Campo Pomar International Airport. He also stated he would change the flag, anthem, and motto to Salvadoran Spanish from Creeperian Spanish. Pareja Palau repeated that the first thing he would do is begin negotiations with the Creeperian government about the DINA. He also added that he would invest 1 billion colóns into the tourism market and invest into the infrastructure of cities along the Granada River, stating that the roads would be "completely redone." He also stated he wanted to redevelop the airports of Ciudad Los'Ángeles, El Congo, and El Mozote for larger planes and more passengers. The third question presented was "Why should you be chosen over your opponent." Morales Cabrera said that he should be chosen over his opponent as Pareja Palau "is too quick to make his decisions and too intense." Morales Cabrera stated that his platform involved "making El Salvador for Salvadorans while [Pareja Palau's] keeps us a little too close for comfort with Creeperopolis." He stated that the current relationship with Creeperopolis was fine but he did not want to be closer. Pareja Palau claimed that Morales Cabrera was actually the one wanting to bring El Salvador closer to Creeperopolis since he was the incumbent Mayor of Santa Ana. He stated, "I want El Salvador for Salvadorans. I will get the DINA out of the country or get them to give us control of their division here." He continued by sating, "[a]ll of the money I invest during my presidency will be for El Salvador, not for Creeperopolis. [The money] will go to CODECO, not directly Creeperopolis, for [all] members of the alliance. I am the one that cares about the Salvadorans." The fourth and final general question was about what the candidates thought of the Ciudad Los'Ángeles Agreement. Morales Cabrera said that he "absolutely" supported the agreement for a peaceful settlement to the issue as the best route possible. He stated that it allowed for elections and for more say to people on how they are governed. He stated that "[it s]atisfies both sides of the argument and [it is a] generally good agreement." Pareja Palau stated "I strongly agree with the agreement. It is the best path for El Salvador to be a greater demoracy. It has been a very flawed democracy since 1970 and this is the best step for further democratization." He expressed further support for the legislative elections as well and that it provided a greater say to people.
Franco Rodríguez then presented the candidates four domestic policy questions. The first question was about which political party running in the legislative elections the candidates support. Morales Cabrera stated his support for the Salvadoran Popular Movement in the legislative election stating that "the platform is the best for El Salvador. It brings something new and something fresh." He stated that Paúl Sáenz Guerrero would be "fantastic for the country." Pareja Palau endorsed Roberto Sánchez Figueroa and the Salvadoran Pro-Fatherland Front for the legislative election. He expressed that "[t]hey stick to our values that we have because we are all Catholics in the country. They hold that religion true and will put our religion and traditions and beliefs first before anything else. They have endorsed me and I will endorse them to lead our legislative part of our government." The second question was about the presence of the National Intelligence Direcorate (DINA) in El Salvador. Morales Cabrera did not support the DINA presence. He stated that there was an agreement in 1956 that they would leave, but he thought that there should be a Salvadoran division to better serve the Salvadoran government. He thought that the country having its own intelligence deptartment would be useful stating "[w]e should utilize the DINA presence already established [and] turn it into a Salvadoran agency." Pareja Palau agreed with Morales Cabrera and said that the DINA should be made a into Salvadoran agency in El Salvador. He said it can be used to crack down on crime in El Salvador. He stated, "[t]he DINA agreed to not come back, yet they have, but since they are here, we should make the best of it to make it our own and enforce our laws." Franco Rodríguez's third question was wether the Salvadoran National Police should be militarized, reformed, or remain as it currently was. Morales Cabrera said that they should "somewhat demilitarize" the national police and that it went along with plan for a Salvadoran DINA. Martial law established by Creeperopolis, but "most people not a fan of martial law and militarization of police." He wanted to replace that militarized role with a Salvadoran DINA. Pareja Palau said that they should give the police "more funds and better weapons. We need to further militarize them to help them crack down on crime." He wanted martial law lidfted and for the Creeperian Army to leave. He wanted a self sufficient militarized police to "appropriately handle with the terrorists of Mara Salvatrucha." The final question was what the candidates thought of the death penalty in El Salvador. Morales Cabrera supported the death penalty but thought that there should be limitations on the death penalty. He stated that some crimes could be downsized to life in prison, specifically stating that homosexuality should be removed from capital punishment to therapy or life imprisonment. He stated that "[n]o one is born gay. It is learned later in life. We can help cure them through therapy or life imprisonment." Pareja Palau also supported the death penalty but he did not want to remove any crimes as qualifiers. He stated he wanted to make the death penalty automatic and extrajudicial in some cases relating to gang activity.
Franco Rodríguez presented the candidates nine foreign policy questions. The first question presented was if the candidates supported foreign investment into El Salvador. Morales Cabrera stated he "absolutely" supported foreign and Creeperian investors in his agenda to allow for resource investment and job creation, specifically the National Mining and Smelting Corporation (CORNAMIF). He wanted to attract investors from all across the world and specifically Greater Sacramento to learn from their strong economy. He also said it could give new cultural influences to El Salvador. Pareja Palau supported foreign and Creeperian investors, specifically the Creeperian National Coffee and Sugar Corporation (CORNACA) to use land for growing coffee and sugar in El Salvador so El Salvador would not have to buy goods from Creeperopolis. He wanted those products in El Salvador to lower prices.[15] Wants to bring Quebecshirite investors due to trade relationship "look what Quebecshire did to them. They're the second largest economy. We want them to do that to us."[15] The second question was what the candidates thought of the Cooperation and Development Coalition (CODECO). Morales Cabrera said he was absolutely supportive of Lyoa and CODECO "brought nothing but prosperity." He wanted to maintain position in alliance as "overall benefit for El Salvador." He talked about Lyoa's natural resources wealth and floated the idea of introducing Salvadoran companies to Lyoa. Pareja Palau also supported El Salvador's involvement in CODECO, stating that membership helps the economy and makes people in El Salvador wealthier overall. He wanted CORNACA in the country to sell products to CODECO and Lyoa to increase the trading power of Salvadoran products. He brought up the general alignment of CODECO to the Terraconserva Economic Union (TEU).[15]
The third question began the heavily racist portion of the debate. The question was regarding El Salvador's relationship with Quebecshire. Morales Cabrera "absolutely supports El Salvador's relationship with Quebecshire." He said it was similar to the relations with CODECO, as they were "building [a] relationship with international community is helpful to our economy and for growth." He again called for international investments and mentioned it would bring El Salvador closer to the TEU. He claimed the Quebecshire is taking stand against "Malger World Order" and will help "prevent us from being taken over by the Malgers." Pareja Palau agreed with Morales Cabrera stating that Quebecshirite investment would be essential and they would be able to help the economy. He reiterated the desire to "stop the Malgers from influencing the world." He stated that "Quebecshire is essential to keeping the Malgers outside of El Salvador." The fourth question regarded the alleged Malgan ethnic cleansing which was allegedly occuring in Terranihil. Morales Cabrera stated that allegations of the Malgan ethnic cleansing is "Malger propaganda," claiming that it was an allegation to make the TEU appear racist. He stated bluntly that "hating Malgers is not racist" and claimed that "they're just trying to discredit the good international standing of Terranihil to weaken TEU and eventually destroy El Salvador." Pareja Palau stated that "this ethnic cleansing is complete Malger propaganda. Their world order is trying to destroy the TEU by slandering Terranihil and accusing Quebecshire of supporting a genocide." He stated that "Ernest Pyle's experiment in Terranihil was illegal and he is a terrorist." He expressed hope that Pyle would be turned over to the Terranihian authorities to face trial for his "crimes." He also bluntly stated "[b]ut I really wish [the Malgan ethnic cleansing] was real. It would be the best way to stop the Malgers from taking over the world. Terranihil, please initiate that into your country." The fifth question regarded El Salvador's relations with the TEU. Morales Cabrera wished to improve relations with "the whole TEU in general. It is a great way to prevent the Malgers from utilizing their Squg puppets to destroy El Salvador. Any country wishing to oppose Malgers and Squgs is a country we should do business with." Pareja Palau agreed with Morales Cabrera and said that El Salvador should be focused on broader TEU. He stated, "[l]ike my opponent said, we need to get closer with them to stop the Squgs in Sequoyah. One of their presidential candidates literally wants to militairze the border, [and] that's an act of aggression." He claimed that Sequoyan "aggression" against Creeperopolis was a part of the "Malger World Order's" plan and that TCN Resolution 002 was to destroy Creeperopolis and El Salvador. He claimed that "Quebecshire and what became the TEU came to Creeperopolis's defense to stop the Malgers and Squgs from destroying our country." He ran out of his alloted time and Franco Rodríguez informed him that his time was up, but Pareja Palau told him to "shut up, you're like a Malger" and continued talking for ten more seconds.[15]
The sixth question was about Paleocacherian and Malgan investment and involvement in Sequoyah. Morales Cabrera stated that the "Malger–Squg World Order is something that is attempting to establish itself." He said that Paleocacherian and Malgan behavior in Sequoyah was a threat to security and existence of the nation. He stated, "[i]t's obvious that [Malgax] intends to use Sequoyah as a puppet to send [Sequoyans] northward to destroy Creeperopolis and El Salvador" and that recent actions threatened the power balance in the Southern Continent. He said that Creeperopolis should annex "Squg state." Pareja Palau said, "[y]es, these revelations are absolutely a threat to Salvadoran existence." He claimed that "Paleocacher is bending over and bootlicking for the Malgers. The Malgers are controlling Aurebeshia." He claimed that Malgax still supported Sequoyah covertly. He stated that the "Malgers supported Morova, the international pariah." He credited Creeperopolis for the Morovan "obliteration" in April 2020. He stated that the "Malgers need to be stopped. Squgs need to be stopped. Paleocacher needs to stop bending over for Malgax and Aurebeshia. They need to leave Aurebeshia. The Malgers need to be punished for supporting Sequoyah." He argued with the moderator when told his time had elapsed several times. The seventh question regarded allegations that the TEU was an imperialist organization. Morales Cabrera stated that the TEU was not an imperialist organization and that the allegation was a "Malger propaganda piece" and that "Malgax is imperialist." He stated that "[a]ll the TEU has done is benefit each [nation] and unify to support each [nation]." He stated that the TEU is anti-imperialist and "preventing Malgers from taking over the plant." Pareja Palau said that the "TEU is essential for El Salvador's existence. It is not at all imperialistic." He claimed that it is an economic union to aid member states and protect them. He continued, "[t]he TEU are not the imperialists, the Aurebeshia Malgers are the imperialists." He listed the Aurebeshian member states and said that they're all imperialists. He claimed that the Aurebesh constitution requires homosexuality to join. The eighth question regarded allegations that Aurebeshia was an imperialist organization. Morales Cabrera said that Aurebeshia "is absolutely imperialist" and "under control of the Malgers" and claimed that they "force you to be gay to join [Aurebeshia]" and that the Malgers want to "take over the world." He said that Aurebeshia should be condemned as imperialist and claimed that Aurebeshia is controlled by "Malger World Empire." Pareja Palau stated that "Aurebeshia is most definitely imperialist." He brought up the homosexuality clause in article one claim again and he claimed that TCN Resolutions 002, 004, and 006 were meant to "destroy our country." He claimed that "[Aurebeshia] just felll apart with TCN Resolution 009" stating that "[t]hey can't even go through with their plans. They're too gay to do so." He said that Malgax must be stopped and that Malgax "is using the Squgs and Lincoln to destroy our country. He called for the dismantling and opposing Aurebeshia. The last question allowed the candidates to address any issue not yet addressed that they wanted to bring attention to. Morales Cabrera mentioned "moving to reestablish El Salvador having its own sort of government" and said that the Lyoan government should be directly supported by a Salvadoran DINA against insurgents that were "probably backed by the Malger government." Pareja Palau addressed the alleged "Jewish Holocaust" conspiracy theory in Greater Sacramento. The stated that the rest of world must know the truth of the "Jewish Holocaust." He stated that "[w]e will destroy the Malgers, stop Aurebeshia, and spread the truth [of the "Jewish Holocaust"] across the entire world." He claimed that the Malgans were hiding the truth.[15]
One audience question was presented by the moderator. It was regarding Salvadoran relations with Eminople and if they should begin diplomacy. Morales Cabrera stated "absolutely not" on improving relations with Eminople "until they leave Malgerbeshia." Pareja Palau, on the other hand, wanted to engage in diplomacy "now" to "inform them that the Malgers are controlling their government." He thought that he can help them leave the "Aurebesh-Malger-Squg superstate." Allegeations are made that a question was denied regarding Pareja Palau allegedly saying "[y]ou can think that" when Franco Rodríguez told him "your chances at being elected are at the will of the voters."[15][better source needed] Pareja Palau denied making the remark, stating that it was "Malgan propaganda."
The moderator allowed the two to make their closing statements. Pareja Palau stated that El Salvador "must be put first." He wanted to improve the economy and bring foreign and Creeperian investment for growth and cheaper goods. He wanted to "support CODECO and oppose Malgers and stop Malgerbeshia." He wanted to "support our economy and our people first before anyone else." Morales Cabrera stated "we should focus a lot of internal development." He mentioned his plan for a high spead rail line, airport renovations, and international investments. He mentioned his proposed National Welfare Initiatve to physically benefit the country and to benefit its people to "prevent a Malger takeover of our country." He said that if elected, "there will be no destruction of El Salvador. We will continue to grow and prosper without any Malger interference."
International reactions to the first debate
During the debate, the world "Malger," a Malgaphobic racial slur, was said a total of 69 times while "Squg," an anti-Sequoyan racial slur, was said around 40 times.[15] The Liberal Union of Gagium denounced the "overt racism" of the debate and stated that it would continue to fight racism "aborad and at home." Terranilian National News stated that the audiences that watched the debate "approve[d] of both candidates, especially regarding Malgax and Aurebeshia." Domitien Ntaryamira, a Lyoan politician, stated that he approved the candidates' "strong stance against homosexuality."
The Quebecshirite Broadcasting Corporation (SRQ) stated that it was a "passionate debate" full of "fiscal intelligence and social falsehoods, with a firey ultranationalism." It stated that Quebecshirites thought that both candidates were socially delusional but that Pareja Palau was "economically best for both Quebecshire and El Salvador."[15] According to the SRQ in an analysis posted the day after the debate, only 12% of its viewers or readers believed the candidates demonstrated "a state of stability and informedness" on social issues.[15]
Second deabte
The second debate was scheduled to take place in Ciudad Los'Ángeles on 17 October and it was supposed to be hosted by El Salvadoreño and broadcasted on Channel Twelve, but both invitees, Morales Cabrera and Castillo Reyes, did not show up to the debate and the debate was canceled by the Salvadoran government. Both candidates failing to attend the debate caused both of their polling numbers to fall substantially with a significant increase in respondents stating they prefer Praeja Palau or are "Undecided" instead of either Morales Cabrera or Castillo Reyes.
Initiative complaint
The day following the debate's cancelation, both El Salvadoreño and Channel Twelve filed a complaint with the Creeperian Initiative over the loss of money in organizating the debate.[23] Both lost an estimated $34 million colóns in organizating the debates.[23] The Initiative paid both media outlets $34 million colóns in compensation.[23] To compensate itself, the Initiative fined both candidates $34 million colóns and subsequently uninvited Castillo Reyes from the third debate against Pareja Palau.[23]
Third debate
The first debate was supposed to take place in Ciudad Los'Ángeles on 24 October. It was supposed to be hosted by Noticias de la'Iniciativa and was planned to be broadcasted on Channel Ten. Pareja Palau and Castillo Reyes were invited to take part in the debate, but Castillo Reyes' invitation was revoked after he failed to attend the second debate.[23] The debate moderator, Ángel Monteiro Sanó, failed to attend the debate and the debate was canceled.
Opinion polls
Date | Polling firm | Sample size | 60px | Undecided | None/abstaining | Lead | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pareja Palau (IC) |
Morales Cabrera (IC) |
Castillo Reyes (IC) | ||||||
7 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,291 | 36 | 23 | 30 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
7 October 2020 | El Salvadoreño | 1,284 | 26 | 25 | 30 | 10 | 9 | 4 |
7 October 2020 | Noticias de la'Iniciativa | 1,239 | 33 | 31 | 32 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
7 October 2020 | Ciudadanos Salvadoreños | 1,481 | 21 | 37 | 33 | 7 | 2 | 4 |
7 October 2020 | Noticias de la'Iniciativa | 1,028 | 40 | 20 | 36 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
7 October 2020 | Romeristos Salvadoreños | 1,111 | 28 | 35 | 32 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
8 October 2020 | Noticias de la'Iniciativa | 1,248 | 36 | 25 | 29 | 7 | 3 | 7 |
8 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,418 | 33 | 30 | 30 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
9 October 2020 | Noticias de la'Iniciativa | 1,333 | 32 | 28 | 33 | 5 | 2 | 1 |
9 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,381 | 32 | 31 | 31 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
10 October 2020 | Noticias de la'Iniciativa | 1,831 | 40 | 34 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
10 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 2,418 | 42 | 39 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
10 October 2020 | Ciudadanos Salvadoreños | 1,219 | 40 | 42 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
10 October 2020 | Romeristos Salvadoreños | 1,381 | 33 | 39 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
11 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,291 | 52 | 37 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 15 |
11 October 2020 | Ciudadanos Salvadoreños | 1,319 | 40 | 45 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
12 October 2020 | Ciudadanos Salvadoreños | 985 | 30 | 56 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 26 |
12 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,219 | 35 | 34 | 20 | 8 | 3 | 1 |
13 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,194 | 35 | 34 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
14 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,048 | 40 | 36 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
14 October 2020 | Ciudadanos Salvadoreños | 1,391 | 36 | 39 | 23 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
15 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,381 | 38 | 36 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
15 October 2020 | Romeristos Salvadoreños | 1,024 | 37 | 39 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
16 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,294 | 36 | 35 | 24 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
17 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,921 | 56 | 22 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 34 |
17 October 2020 | Ciudadanos Salvadoreños | 1,284 | 48 | 21 | 14 | 15 | 2 | 27 |
17 October 2020 | Noticias de la'Iniciativa | 1,371 | 63 | 19 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 44 |
18 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,028 | 47 | 25 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 2 |
19 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,239 | 39 | 30 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
20 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,483 | 45 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 5 | 22 |
21 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,383 | 44 | 25 | 21 | 7 | 3 | 19 |
22 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,845 | 50 | 31 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 19 |
23 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,845 | 52 | 25 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 27 |
24 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,373 | 48 | 23 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 25 |
25 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,373 | 49 | 32 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 17 |
26 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,048 | 50 | 33 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 17 |
27 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,048 | 51 | 33 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 18 |
28 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,384 | 49 | 30 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 19 |
29 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,394 | 45 | 35 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
30 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,394 | 50 | 30 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 20 |
31 October 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,284 | 51 | 40 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
1 November 2020 | Gaceta Creeperiano | 1,344 | 49 | 41 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
Overall | 50,980 | 41.36 | 32.14 | 20.19 | 4.43 | 1.88 | 9.22 |
Results
Results overall
42.75% | 39.89% | 17.36% |
Pareja Palau | Morales Cabrera | Castillo Reyes |
Results by department
Departments won by Pareja Palau | |
Departments won by Morales Cabrera | |
Departments won by Castillo Reyes | |
Departments not yet determined | |
DW | Departments Won |
Department | Orlando Pareja Palau Initiative |
Santiago Morales Cabrera Initiative |
César Castillo Reyes Initiative |
Margin | Total votes |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | DW | Votes | % | DW | Votes | % | DW | Votes | % | |||
El Calabozo | 267,532 | 42.59% | – | 283,403 | 45.11% | 1 | 77,229 | 12.30% | – | 15,871 | 2.52% | 628,164 | [24] |
El Congo | 400,298 | 42.01% | 1 | 370,317 | 38.86% | – | 182,315 | 19.13% | – | 29,981 | 3.15% | 952,930 | [25] |
El Mozote | 267,481 | 37.97% | – | 284,655 | 40.41% | 1 | 152,337 | 21.62% | – | 17,174 | 2.44% | 704,473 | [26] |
El Paraíso | 281,037 | 50.84% | 1 | 161,410 | 29.20% | – | 110,382 | 19.96% | – | 119,627 | 21.64% | 552,829 | [27] |
Los'Ángeles | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Ñancahuazú | 681,706 | 40.41% | – | 709,205 | 42.04% | 1 | 296,083 | 17.55% | – | 27,499 | 1.63% | 1,686,994 | [28] |
Nuevo Honduras | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Santa Ana del Norte | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Vallepital | 180,376 | 53.47% | 1 | 130,519 | 38.69% | – | 26,447 | 7.84 | – | 49,857 | 14.78% | 337,342 | [29] |
Resulsts by municipality
Municipalities won by Pareja Palau | |
Municipalities won by Morales Cabrera | |
Municipalities won by Castillo Reyes | |
Municipalities not yet determined | |
MW | Municipalities Won |
Municiaplity | Orlando Pareja Palau Initiative |
Santiago Morales Cabrera Initiative |
César Castillo Reyes Initiative |
Margin | Total votes |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Votes | % | MW | Votes | % | MW | Votes | % | MW | Votes | % | |||
Aguiguiri | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Alorican | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Amanimo | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Amidino | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Amijar | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Antirate | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Apocagua | 113,483 | 40.43% | 1 | 112,385 | 40.04% | – | 54,822 | 19.53% | – | 1,098 | 0.39% | 280,690 | [25] |
Arenejo | 43,584 | 43.94% | 1 | 43,114 | 43.47% | – | 12,483 | 12.59% | – | 470 | 0.47% | 99,181 | [24] |
Aririca | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Arrata | 55,282 | 42.28% | 1 | 53,284 | 40.75% | – | 22,182 | 16.97% | – | 1,998 | 1.53% | 130,748 | [24] |
Ataranza | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Ayutupango | 45,748 | 41.11% | 1 | 40,573 | 36.46% | – | 24,962 | 22.43% | – | 5,175 | 4.65% | 111,283 | [26] |
Azasica | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Bejutiva | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Borones | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Bugamito | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Caimirobos | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Caito | 54,281 | 56.69% | 1 | 32,182 | 33.61% | – | 9,282 | 9.70% | – | 22,099 | 23.08% | 95,745 | [24] |
Carrilos | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Cazan | 17,475 | 38.54% | – | 22,584 | 49.80% | 1 | 5,288 | 11.66% | – | 5,109 | 11.26% | 45,347 | [29] |
Ciudad Los'Ángeles | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Chimallas | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Chirilan | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Chirinome | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Chirisa | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Cojutepera | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Comimula | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Coraranza | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Coricia | 10,294 | 41.88% | – | 11,000 | 44.75% | 1 | 3,288 | 13.375 | – | 706 | 2.87% | 24,582 | [29] |
Cormoto | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Currilades | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Dedabat | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Dancaome | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Dipilto | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
El Calabozo | 114,385 | 37.81% | – | 154,823 | 51.18% | 1 | 33,282 | 11.01% | – | 40,438 | 13.37% | 302,490 | [24] |
El Congo | 175,576 | 39.96% | – | 177,383 | 40.37% | 1 | 86,383 | 19.67% | – | 1,807 | 0.41% | 439,342 | [25] |
El Coria | 23,474 | 50.56% | 1 | 15,372 | 33.11% | – | 7,582 | 16.33% | – | 8,102 | 17.45% | 46,428 | [25] |
El Mararosa | 11,288 | 65.04% | 1 | 3,583 | 20.64% | – | 2,485 | 14.32% | – | 8,803 | 44.40% | 17,356 | [29] |
El Maracala | 103,285 | 39.56% | – | 104,583 | 40.07% | 1 | 53,222 | 20.37% | – | 1,298 | 0.51% | 261,090 | [28] |
El Mozote | 117,685 | 38.11% | – | 121,360 | 39.30% | 1 | 69,753 | 22.59% | – | 3,675 | 1.19% | 308,798 | [26] |
El Nismada | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
El Paimango | 8,284 | 80.94% | 1 | 1,495 | 14.61% | – | 456 | 4.45% | – | 6,789 | 66.33% | 10,235 | [29] |
El Paitoto | 69,274 | 39.46% | – | 75,383 | 42.94% | 1 | 30,916 | 17.60% | – | 6,109 | 3.48% | 175,573 | [28] |
El Paraíso | 113,292 | 42.28% | 1 | 101,293 | 37.79% | – | 53,387 | 19.93% | – | 11,999 | 4.49% | 267,972 | [27] |
El Rosamoros | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
El Tumramos | 28,284 | 98.58% | 1 | 294 | 1.02% | – | 111 | 0.40% | – | 27,990 | 97.56% | 28,689 | [29] |
Escacona | 68,283 | 48.01% | 1 | 45,689 | 32.13% | – | 28,244 | 19.86% | – | 22,594 | 15.88% | 142,216 | [25] |
Estanpango | 67,383 | 61.73% | 1 | 20,192 | 18.49% | – | 21,582 | 19.78% | – | 45,801 | 41.95% | 109,157 | [27] |
Fraicapan | 8,294 | 82.45% | 1 | 1,445 | 14.36% | – | 321 | 3.19% | – | 6,849 | 68.09% | 10,060 | [29] |
Guadaza | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Gualatillo | 8,274 | 29.04% | – | 18,733 | 65.76% | 1 | 1,480 | 5.20% | – | 10,459 | 36.72% | 28,487 | [29] |
Guatacate | 110,329 | 45.78% | 1 | 77,383 | 32.11% | – | 53,284 | 22.11% | – | 32,946 | 13.67% | 240,996 | [28] |
Jacoya | 7,184 | 84.17% | 1 | 1,248 | 14.62% | – | 103 | 1.21% | – | 5,936 | 69.55% | 8,535 | [29] |
Jasaya | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Jeriros | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Jimeri | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Jujulutan | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Junlupe | 19,482 | 44.02% | – | 19,488 | 44.04% | 1 | 5,284 | 11.94% | – | 6 | 0.02% | 44,254 | [25] |
Jupera | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
La Pasenti | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
La Timira | 24,385 | 46.54% | – | 25,723 | 49.10% | 1 | 2,284 | 4.36% | – | 1,338 | 2.56% | 52,392 | [29] |
Lejadia | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Los Sanrita | 19,484 | 46.00% | – | 20,284 | 47.89% | 1 | 2,585 | 6.11% | – | 800 | 1.89% | 42,353 | [29] |
Matidro | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Mazatenuatla | 55,766 | 57.73% | 1 | 20,283 | 20.99% | – | 20,555 | 21.28% | – | 35,211 | 36.45% | 96,604 | [27] |
Miraran | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Monpan | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Monrito | 38,824 | 36.18% | – | 50,844 | 46.07% | 1 | 22,197 | 17.75% | – | 12,020 | 9.89% | 110,365 | [28] |
Morrichapa | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Mulasa | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Mutapa | 5,280 | 47.17% | – | 632 | 5.65% | – | 5,281 | 47.18% | 1 | 1 | 0.01% | 11,193 | [29] |
Nandarados | 16,274 | 41.90% | – | 20,184 | 51.96% | 1 | 2,385 | 6.14% | – | 3,910 | 10.06% | 38,843 | [29] |
Nandasmo | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Nuedina | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Ontadi | 6,302 | 99.45% | 1 | 33 | 0.54% | – | 2 | 0.01% | – | 6,269 | 98.91% | 6,337 | [29] |
Pario | 33,282 | 38.99% | – | 39,584 | 46.38% | 1 | 12,482 | 14.63% | – | 6,302 | 7.39% | 85,348 | [28] |
Patamula | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Patzuela | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Piedras Gordas | 44,583 | 39.24% | – | 53,544 | 47.13% | 1 | 15,484 | 13.63% | – | 8,961 | 7.89% | 113,611 | [28] |
Pomocia | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Pomolina | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Poneja | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Popcaja | 23,192 | 52.90% | 1 | 13,147 | 29.99% | – | 7,499 | 17.11% | – | 10,045 | 22.91% | 43,838 | [26] |
Posozonte | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Probac | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Puerdega | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Rosada | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Samago | 78,284 | 40.77% | – | 80,348 | 41.85% | 1 | 33,377 | 17.38% | – | 2,064 | 1.08% | 192,009 | [28] |
San Bevo | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
San Clachito | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
San Estedina | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
San Fracero | 23,322 | 55.43% | 1 | 10,281 | 24.43% | – | 8,475 | 20.14% | – | 13,041 | 31.00% | 42,078 | [27] |
San Jelejo | 21,274 | 57.47% | 1 | 9,361 | 25.29% | – | 6,383 | 17.24% | – | 11,913 | 32.18% | 37,018 | [27] |
San Jemitas | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Santa Telina | 55,283 | 54.71% | 1 | 33,284 | 31.64% | – | 12,485 | 13.65% | – | 21,999 | 23.07% | 101,052 | [28] |
Sanneja | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Santa Barrancho | 80,856 | 33.65% | – | 109,305 | 45.49% | 1 | 50,123 | 20.86% | – | 28,449 | 11.84% | 240,284 | [26] |
Sarrente | 103,282 | 45.88% | 1 | 97,274 | 43.21% | – | 24,555 | 10.91% | – | 6,008 | 2.67% | 225,111 | [28] |
Sesoluca | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Sonsochapan | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Sosaya | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Tecurican | 78,274 | 42.24% | 1 | 73,547 | 39.69% | – | 33,499 | 18.07% | – | 4,727 | 2.55% | 185,320 | [28] |
Tenanzaya | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Terrazas | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Tonapa | 9,274 | 71.71% | 1 | 3,281 | 25.37% | – | 378 | 2.29% | – | 5,993 | 46.34% | 12,933 | [29] |
Totodasmo | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Yalmeri | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Yaquin | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Yavinosi | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Yemewee | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Zambrayagua | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | – | TBD | TBD | TBD | |
Zarajachel | 70,288 | 71.50% | 1 | 23,431 | 23.84% | – | 4,582 | 4.66% | – | 46,857 | 47.66% | 98,301 | [28] |
See also
- 2019 Salvadoran presidential election
- April 2020 Salvadoran presidential election
- 2020 Salvadoran protests
Notes
- ↑ The Gaceta Creeperiano is a right-wing news outlet.
- ↑ El Salvadoreño is a centrist news outlet.
- ↑ Noticias de la'Iniciativa is a far-right news outlet.
References
- ↑ "Beginning of Protests in Ciudad Los'Ángeles". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 14 January 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ "Protests in Ciudad Los'Ángeles Continue". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 15 January 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 "Assassination of Adán Tamayo Navarro". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 16 January 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 4.2 "State of Emergency in El Salvador". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 19 January 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ "Protestors Ordered to Cease Protesting". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 20 January 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ "Protests Mostly Die Down". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 31 January 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ "Little to No Violence Reported". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 4 February 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 8.2 "Snap Election Declared". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 9 April 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ "Snap Election Postponed". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 12 April 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 "Snap Election Postponed Again". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 19 April 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ "Lyoa to Monitor Salvadoran Election". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 19 April 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ "Giammattei Falla Wins Salvadoran Election". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 7 May 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 13.00 13.01 13.02 13.03 13.04 13.05 13.06 13.07 13.08 13.09 13.10 13.11 13.12 13.13 13.14 "Ciudad Los'Ángeles Agreement". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 7 October 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 14.3 "Initiative Announces Candidates". Gaceta Creeperiano El Salvador (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los’Ángeles: Gaceta Creeperiano. 7 October 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 15.00 15.01 15.02 15.03 15.04 15.05 15.06 15.07 15.08 15.09 15.10 15.11 15.12 15.13 15.14 Donnet, Florent. "The Salvadoran Election and its Consequences for Quebecshire and Terraconserva" (in Quebecshirite). Quebecshire City: Quebecshirite Broadcasting Corporation.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 16.0 16.1 "Quebecshirite News Broadcasting for the Salvadoran Presidential Debates" (in Quebecshirite). Quebecshire City: Quebecor.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ "Condemnation of Creeperopolis and the Suggestion of Sanctions (Resolution)".
- ↑ "Condemnation of Creeperopolis (Resolution)".
- ↑ "A Resolution to Launch an Investigation Into Creeperopolis (Resolution)".
- ↑ "Condemnation of Creeperopolis and the Suggestion of Sanctions (Quebecshirite Veto)".
- ↑ "Condemnation of Creeperopolis (Quebecshirite Veto)".
- ↑ "Repeal of TCN Resolution 006 - A Resolution to Launch an Investigation Into Creeperopolis (Resolution)".
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 23.2 23.3 23.4 "Complaint Filed Against the Creeperian Initiative" (in Creeperian Spanish). San Salvador: Noticias de la'Iniciativa.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 24.0 24.1 24.2 24.3 24.4 "El Calabozo Departmental Results" (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los'Ángeles: Government of El Salvador. 1 November 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 25.0 25.1 25.2 25.3 25.4 25.5 "El Congo Departmental Results" (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los'Ángeles: Government of El Salvador. 1 November 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 26.3 26.4 "El Mozote Departmental Results" (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los'Ángeles: Government of El Salvador. 30 October 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 27.4 27.5 "El Paraíso Departmental Results" (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los'Ángeles: Government of El Salvador. 1 November 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 28.00 28.01 28.02 28.03 28.04 28.05 28.06 28.07 28.08 28.09 28.10 28.11 "Ñancahuazú Departmental Results" (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los'Ángeles: Government of El Salvador. 1 November 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
- ↑ 29.00 29.01 29.02 29.03 29.04 29.05 29.06 29.07 29.08 29.09 29.10 29.11 29.12 29.13 29.14 "Vallepital Departmental Results" (in Creeperian Spanish). Ciudad Los'Ángeles: Government of El Salvador. 1 November 2020.CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)