Global ACES
 | |
 | |
| Abbreviation | AGCC |
|---|---|
| Formation | 1 March 1987 |
| Type | Voluntary association |
| Headquarters | Buchthafen, Kivu |
Membership | 13
|
| Website | agcc.org |
The Global ACES program, officially known as the Central Ecrosian Global Policy, is a foreign relations instrument of the Alliance of Central Ecrosian States (ACES). Its primary objective is to foster and enhance relations between ACES and global communities through diplomatic initiatives, cooperation, and exchanges. This program aims to cultivate mutual understanding, peace, and collaboration on a global scale, promoting harmonious interactions between ACES and its international partners. Members meet in a forum known as the Allied Cooperation Council.
Background
The Global ACES program emerged following the implementation of the Marathon Declaration, which marked a significant expansion of the Alliance of Central Ecrosian States' (ACES) mandate beyond regional military affairs. Envisioned as a means to foster closer relations between ACES and its global partners, the program seeks to create an interconnected network of allied countries, promoting integration while not requiring full membership within the Alliance.
Central to the program's framework is the establishment of the Allied Cooperation Council (ACC) as a platform for ACES and its global partners to engage in discussions and collaborations pertaining to political and security matters. Through this council, tailored policies, agreements, and joint initiatives are developed, with a primary focus on advancing representative democracy, individual liberty, trade, and military cooperation among member states.
Structure
Allied Cooperation Council
The Allied Cooperation Council (ACC) operates through action plans that guide its activities, focusing on consultation and cooperation on various political and security matters. Regular meetings are held by ambassadors and representatives of member states. These interactions foster ongoing consultation and cooperation, enabling the council to effectively address a wide range of issues. This includes crisis management, peace support operations, regional concerns, arms control, non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and combating international terrorism.
Within the realm of defense, the ACC takes on critical responsibilities to enhance coordination and preparedness in the face of potential security challenges. Moreover, the ACC plays a key role in promoting and coordinating practical cooperation and the exchange of expertise in crucial areas. This includes combatting terrorism, strengthening border security, and addressing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and small arms. By facilitating information sharing and joint initiatives, the ACC helps member states enhance their capabilities and responses to emerging security threats.
Chairmanship
The ACC operates under a rotating chairmanship system, with one participating state assuming the chairmanship for a yearly term. The country holding the chair plays a central role in managing the council's activities and representing the ACC externally. The chairman's role is crucial in guiding the council's efforts and ensuring effective decision-making.
In 2023, the ACC Chair was held by TBA of member state TBA. The chairmanship for the following year, 2024, is set to be assumed by TBA.
| Year | Country | Chairperson-in-Office |
|---|---|---|
| TBA |  Eleutherios |
TBA |
Secretary-General
The Secretary-General of the ACC acts as the chief administrative officer of the council. The Secretary-General plays a vital role in the day-to-day operations of the organization. In certain situations, upon the request of the Chairmanship, the Secretary-General can also represent the Chairman. The Secretary Generals of the ACC have been:
| Year | Country | Secretary-General |
|---|---|---|
| 1987 |  Kivu |
Patrik Austerlitz |
The role of the Secretary-General is pivotal in maintaining the operational efficiency of the ACC and assisting the Chairman in carrying out their responsibilities. Their contributions contribute to the overall effectiveness and success of the council's activities in promoting cooperation, addressing security challenges, and advancing the goals of the Global ACES program.
Allied Coordinated Military Staff
The Allied Coordinated Military Staff (ACMS) is the highest operational command of the ACES Combined Force, being directed by the ACES Military Committee. It plays a crucial role in executing joint operational coordination between member militaries and the Military Committee, ensuring effective decision-making and coordination within the Alliance. The ACMS operates as a multinational organization that includes military representatives from ACES member states as well as, if they choose to participate, representatives from Global ACES members. This inclusive composition allows for a broader perspective and ensures the representation of diverse military interests and expertise.
ACMS also offers valuable insights and recommendations on matters related to military strategy, operations, capabilities, and planning. It facilitates information sharing, analysis, and coordination among participating member states, enhancing the overall military effectiveness of the Alliance. One of the key functions of the ACMS is to support the chain of command within the ACES structure. It ensures that Global ACES members who choose to participate have the opportunity to be integrated into the command structure, enabling their active involvement in joint military operations and decision-making processes.
Allied Support and Procurement Agency
The Allied Support and Procurement Agency (ASPA) plays a vital role as the main logistics and procurement agency for ACES, extending its support to Global ACES members operating under the ACMS chain of command. ASPA's mandate encompasses five core areas:
- Standardization & Interoperability: ASPA ensures coordination and compatibility among ACES member states and Global ACES participants, promoting seamless cooperation and effective integration.
- Systems Procurement and Life Cycle Management: ASPA oversees the acquisition and management of various systems, equipment, and technologies, ensuring their optimal performance throughout their life cycle.
- Support to Operations and Exercises: ASPA provides vital support during ACES operations and exercises, facilitating logistical activities and ensuring smooth execution.
- Strategic Transport and Storage: ASPA manages strategic transport networks and storage facilities, guaranteeing secure and efficient movement and storage of critical assets, supplies, and equipment.
- Logistics Services and Project Management: ASPA offers comprehensive logistics services and expert project management, encompassing planning, coordination, and execution of complex operations and initiatives.
ASPA also assumes responsibility for fuel management, ensuring a reliable and sustainable fuel supply across the Alliance. By leveraging its diverse capabilities, ASPA significantly enhances operational readiness, streamlines processes, and fosters collaboration within the ACES framework and among Global ACES participants.
Others
In addition to the aforementioned ACC, ACMS, and ASPA, the Global ACES program encompasses various other agencies and institutions that operate within its framework. These entities may evolve and change over time to adapt to the evolving needs and priorities of the program. Their specific roles and functions may vary, but they all contribute to the overarching goals of promoting international cooperation, security, and stability within the Alliance and among its global partners. Listed below are the agencies:
Commission on Democratic Values and Human Rights
Established in 2017, the Commission on Democratic Values and Human Rights emerged as a response to the negligence surrounding human rights issues in Terranihil. Headquartered in Nerfoy, the capital city of Montesayette, the Commission conducts election observation missions and addresses a wide range of human rights concerns, with particular attention given to the Kavardan ethnic group, Alhaz Muslims, and Minaltari Christianity in Terranihil. The Commission promotes dialogue, understanding, and peaceful resolutions to potential tensions while advocating for the rights and well-being of these communities. The Commission also hosts the organisation's Contact Point for Kavardan issues at its Nerfoy office. This Contact Point serves as a key conduit for communication and collaboration, allowing for constructive dialogue and assistance concerning the Kavardan community.
Mediation and Arbitration Council
The Mediation and Arbitration Council (MAC) plays a crucial role within the Global ACES program as a permanent court of arbitration. It handles a wide range of legal issues, including territorial and maritime boundaries, sovereignty, human rights, international investment, and international and regional trade. As an administrative organization, the MAC serves as a registry for international arbitration and related procedures, such as commissions of inquiry and conciliation.
The MAC's primary objective is to provide a reliable and efficient platform for the resolution of international disputes through arbitration. Parties involved in legal conflicts can bring their cases before the MAC, which operates independently and impartially. Serving as a registry, the MAC maintains comprehensive records and documentation related to arbitration proceedings. This ensures transparency and accessibility, allowing member states of the Global ACES program to seek fair and just resolutions for their legal disputes.
The cases brought before the MAC cover a diverse range of complex legal issues, reflecting the multifaceted nature of conflicts that arise in the international arena. These may include disputes over territorial claims, boundaries between nations, human rights violations, investment disputes, or matters related to international trade. By establishing a permanent court of arbitration, the MAC provides member states with a dedicated avenue to address these disputes and seek resolutions in accordance with established rules and procedures.
The MAC comprises a panel of experienced arbitrators and legal experts who possess specialized knowledge in relevant fields. These experts carefully examine the facts, legal principles, and applicable international norms to deliver informed and impartial decisions. The MAC's commitment to transparency, consistency, and adherence to international law ensures the credibility and effectiveness of its arbitration process.
Funding
The Global ACES program relies on member state contributions, including funding from the Allied Development Fund (ADF). The ADF receives financial support outside the ACES budget, with member states contributing based on specific shares or "keys" determined through negotiations. These keys reflect individual states' interests and incentivize high performance.
The ADF's funding structure enables faster and more flexible provision of funds, enhancing efficiency in addressing development challenges. By using distinct contribution keys, separate from the ACES budget, the ADF ensures that resources are allocated according to member states' interests and contributions, maximizing the impact of its initiatives. The ADF and the Global ACES program aim to incentivize member states, promote optimal performance, and expedite fund disbursement. This approach recognizes and rewards countries that demonstrate exemplary commitment while ensuring accessible financial support for development projects aligned with program objectives.
Sound financial management, transparency, and accountability are prioritized within the ADF and the Global ACES program. Regular financial reporting, audits, and oversight mechanisms guarantee responsible fund utilization and adherence to agreed contribution shares.
Membership
Criteria
The eligibility criteria for participation in the Global ACES program closely align with the requirements for ACES membership as stipulated in the Central Ecrosian Treaty. These criteria serve as the basis for evaluating potential participants and ensuring a consistent standard across the Alliance and its global partnerships. The criteria for membership in the Global ACES program are outlined in the Buchthafen Communiqué, which provides the current set of guidelines. The communiqué begins by describing the program's identity, defining the relationship between the organization and its members, and outlining its fundamental goals:
- "The Global ACES program is a voluntary association of independent sovereign states, each responsible for its own policies, consulting and co-operating in the common interests of their peoples and in the promotion of international understanding and world peace."
The second article highlights the wide-ranging nature of the Global ACES program, bringing together nations of varying economic statuses across different continents and vast oceans. It emphasizes the inclusivity and diversity of the program. The third article asserts that membership in the program is compatible with membership in other international organizations or maintaining a non-aligned status, as long as these affiliations do not compromise the core values and principles outlined in the Central Ecrosian Treaty. The membership rules outline specific requirements for countries seeking to join the Global ACES program. These requirements include:
- Applicant countries must accept and adhere to the fundamental values, principles, and priorities set forth in the Buchthafen Communiqué, as well as subsequent declarations, protocols, and annexes.
- Applicant countries must demonstrate a strong commitment to democracy, including the conduct of free and fair elections and the presence of representative legislatures. They must also uphold the rule of law, maintain an independent judiciary, promote good governance practices, and ensure the protection of human rights, freedom of expression, and equality of opportunity.
- Applicant countries must be fully independent sovereign states, capable of making autonomous decisions and representing their own national interests.
- Applicant countries are expected to respect and take into account the wishes of their general population regarding membership in the Global ACES program.
Members
Currently, there are six global partners associated with the Alliance of Central Ecrosian States (ACES). The membership categories within the Global ACES program can be broadly classified into two types: full partners and partners in arrears. The distinction between these categories reflects differences in their level of participation and obligations.
- Full partners actively engage in all aspects of the program and have a comprehensive role within ACES. They are required to contribute to the Allied Development Fund. Full partners have the opportunity to attend various functions and organs of the Global ACES program, including the annual ACC summit.
- On the other hand, partners in arrears have a more limited scope of participation. While they can attend most functions and organs of the program, they are not invited to the annual AGCC summit. One significant difference is that partners in arrears are not obligated to make contributions to the Allied Development Fund. Instead, they receive increased assistance and investment from the fund, which can support their development efforts.
The distinction between full partners and partners in arrears serves to differentiate between developed members and developing members within the Global ACES program. It allows for tailored approaches to meet the specific needs and capacities of each member, while promoting collaboration and support among all participants.
| Country | Joined | Type | Free Trade Provisions | International Military Staff | Capital | Population | Currency | Government | Location | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Baltanla
|
24/12/2014 | Full | Yes | Yes | Baltanla City | 120,000,000 | Dong | Semi-presidential republic | Ostlandet | See Baltanla in ACES |
 Gjorka
|
28/06/2023 | Full | Yes | No | Gjorka City | 70,410,005 | Pón | Presidential republic | Ostlandet | See Gjorkan in ACES |
 Karimun
|
01/01/2002 | Full | Yes | No | Giovanni | 54,775,500 | Peta | Presidential republic | Northern Ecros | See Karimun in ACES |
 Entropan
|
30/09/2023 | Full | Yes | No | Maledonia | 24,500,000 | Felco | Participatory polity | Northern Ecros | See Entropan in ACES |
 Monsilva
|
22/12/2014 | Full | Yes | No | Amking | 50,012,300 | Yupian | Parliamentary republic | Ostlandet | See Monsilva in ACES |
 Paleocacher
|
DD/MM/YY | Full | Gardena | 205,000,000 | Selkie | Presidential republic | Ostlandet | See Paleocacher in ACES | ||
 Tumland
|
11/06/2007 | In arrears | Tum Central | 38,000,000 | Gregoris | Athenian democracy | Southern Ecros | See Tumland in ACES |
Additionally, in 1989, Reykanes made an attempt to join the Global ACES program as a response to the growing influence of CODECO. Led by MP Leópold Wernersson, the movement within the Reykani Parliament sought to align with the Global ACES program as a counterbalance. However, despite the concerns over CODECO and its power dynamics, Reykanes' majority still maintained strong support for its longstanding policy of strict neutrality. This, coupled with the concerns over human rights issues within ACES itself, led to Reykanes ultimately abandoning the negotiations to join Global ACES.
Suspension
In cases of serious or persistent violations of the Buchthafen Communiqué, particularly related to the absence of democratic governance, members of the Global ACES program may face suspension from both the Allied Cooperation Council and the Allied Development Fund. The decision to suspend a member is made by the Central Ecrosian Council. During a period of suspension, the affected member is excluded from participation in meetings of Allied leaders and ministers. However, it's important to note that the member remains a part of the organization despite their suspension. This measure serves as a means to address significant violations while allowing for the potential for remedial action and eventual reinstatement.
Withdrawal
Membership in the Global ACES program is entirely voluntary, and member governments retain the freedom to withdraw from the program at any point. While heads of government possess the authority to suspend member states from active participation in the program, there are no provisions within the program for the expulsion of members.
The absence of an expulsion mechanism underscores the principle of sovereign equality among member states. The Global ACES program recognizes that differences and disagreements may arise among members, and the focus remains on fostering dialogue, cooperation, and understanding to address challenges and promote shared goals. The program values inclusivity and the opportunity for constructive engagement, even in the face of differences, thereby allowing for the potential for reconciliation and future collaboration.
