Global ACES
 | |
| Abbreviation | AGCC |
|---|---|
| Formation | TBA |
| Type | Voluntary association |
| Headquarters | Hauptstadt, Kivu |
Membership | 13
|
| Expenses | TBA |
| Website | agcc.org |
The Global ACES program, officially known as the Central Ecrosian Global Policy, is a foreign relations instrument of the Alliance of Central Ecrosian States (ACES). Its primary objective is to foster and enhance relations between ACES and global communities through diplomatic initiatives, cooperation, and exchanges. This program aims to cultivate mutual understanding, peace, and collaboration on a global scale, promoting harmonious interactions between ACES and its international partners.
On the other hand, the Allied Global Cooperation Council (AGCC; Kivuian: Alliierter Globaler Kooperationsrat, AGKr) is a multilateral forum established under the umbrella of the Global ACES program. Its central purpose is to strengthen relations between ACES and its global partners by facilitating cooperation and dialogue on matters of politics and security. The AGCC operates under a broad mandate, encompassing various key areas such as the promotion of representative democracy, safeguarding individual liberty, pursuing equality while actively opposing racism, addressing poverty, ignorance, and disease, as well as advocating for free trade. As a collaborative platform, the AGCC closely collaborates with the program to devise customized policies and agreements that effectively address the unique needs and interests of its member states.
Background
The Global ACES program emerged following the implementation of the Marathon Declaration, which marked a significant expansion of the Alliance of Central Ecrosian States' (ACES) mandate beyond military affairs. Envisioned as a means to foster closer relations between ACES and its global partners, the program seeks to create an interconnected network of allied countries, promoting integration while not requiring full membership within the Alliance. The ACES Parliamentary Assembly played a key role in outlining this policy in 2003.
Central to the program's framework is the establishment of the Allied Global Cooperation Council (AGCC) as a multilateral forum. The AGCC serves as a platform for ACES and its global partners to engage in discussions and collaborations pertaining to political and security matters. Through this council, tailored policies, agreements, and joint initiatives are developed, with a primary focus on advancing representative democracy, individual liberty, equality, poverty eradication, disease prevention, and free trade among member states. The AGCC serves as a catalyst for dialogue and cooperation, fostering a shared commitment to these fundamental principles.
Structure
Allied Global Cooperation Council
The Allied Global Cooperation Council (AGCC) serves as a significant pillar within the Global ACES program, facilitating bilateral relationships between ACES and its partner countries. The council operates through two-year action plans that guide its activities, focusing on consultation and cooperation on various political and security matters. Under the AGCC framework, regular monthly meetings are held among ambassadors, while annual meetings bring together foreign and defense ministers. These interactions foster ongoing consultation and cooperation, enabling the council to effectively address a wide range of issues. This includes crisis management, peace support operations, regional concerns, arms control, non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and combating international terrorism.
Within the realm of defense, the AGCC takes on critical responsibilities such as planning, budgeting, policy and strategy development, civil emergency planning, disaster preparedness, nuclear safety, air control, and scientific exploration. These efforts aim to enhance coordination and preparedness in the face of potential security challenges. Moreover, the AGCC plays a key role in promoting and coordinating practical cooperation and the exchange of expertise in crucial areas. This includes combatting terrorism, strengthening border security, and addressing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and small arms. By facilitating information sharing and joint initiatives, the AGCC helps member states enhance their capabilities and responses to emerging security threats.
Chairmanship
The AGCC operates under a rotating chairmanship system, with one participating state assuming the chairmanship for a yearly term. The country holding the chair plays a central role in managing the council's activities and representing the AGCC externally. The senior position within the AGCC is held by the chair's foreign minister, who serves as the Chairperson-in-Office (CiO). As the CiO, the chairperson is responsible for coordinating the work of AGCC institutions, representing the council in various engagements, and overseeing activities related to conflict prevention, crisis management, and post-conflict rehabilitation. The CiO's role is crucial in guiding the council's efforts and ensuring effective decision-making.
To support their work, the CiO is assisted by the previous and incoming chairpersons-in-office, forming the AGCC Troika. This Troika, consisting of the current, past, and future chairs, provides continuity and facilitates the exchange of knowledge and experiences. Additionally, the CiO appoints Personal Representatives who are experts in specific fields of priority for the chairmanship. These representatives contribute their expertise to advance the objectives of the AGCC under the leadership of the CiO.
For instance, in 2023, the AGCC Chair was held by TBA, with its foreign minister, TBA, serving as the Chairperson-in-Office. The chairmanship for the following year, 2024, is set to be assumed by TBA, with its foreign minister, TBA, representing the role of Chairperson-in-Office.
| Year | Country | Chairperson-in-Office |
|---|---|---|
| TBA |  Eleutherios |
TBA |
Secretary-General
Since the establishment of the office in TBA, the AGCC has appointed several individuals to serve as Secretary-General, who act as the chief administrative officer of the council. While the Chairperson-in-Office holds the most senior position within the AGCC, the Secretary-General plays a vital role in the day-to-day operations of the organization. In certain situations, upon the request of the Chairmanship, the Secretary-General can also represent the Chairperson-in-Office. The Secretary Generals of the AGCC have been:
| Year | Country | Secretary-General |
|---|---|---|
| TBA |  Kivu |
TBA |
Each Secretary-General brings their expertise and leadership to facilitate the smooth functioning of the AGCC and support the implementation of its objectives. They work closely with the Chairperson-in-Office and other key stakeholders to ensure effective coordination, communication, and administrative support within the council. The role of the Secretary-General is pivotal in maintaining the operational efficiency of the AGCC and assisting the Chairperson-in-Office in carrying out their responsibilities. Their contributions contribute to the overall effectiveness and success of the council's activities in promoting cooperation, addressing security challenges, and advancing the goals of the Global ACES program.
Allied International Military Staff
The Allied International Military Staff (AIMS) is an advisory body and the international extension of the ACES Military Committee. It plays a crucial role in providing strategic advice and executive support to the Military Committee, ensuring effective decision-making and coordination within the Alliance. The AIMS operates as a multinational organization that includes military representatives from ACES member states as well as, if they choose to participate, representatives from Global ACES members. This inclusive composition allows for a broader perspective and ensures the representation of diverse military interests and expertise.
As an advisory body, the AIMS offers valuable insights and recommendations on matters related to military strategy, operations, capabilities, and planning. It facilitates information sharing, analysis, and coordination among participating member states, enhancing the overall military effectiveness of the Alliance. One of the key functions of the AIMS is to support the chain of command within the ACES structure. It ensures that Global ACES members who choose to participate have the opportunity to be integrated into the command structure, enabling their active involvement in joint military operations and decision-making processes.
By providing this strategic advice and executive support, the AIMS plays a vital role in maintaining the readiness, interoperability, and collective defense capabilities of ACES and its member states. It fosters cooperation and coordination among military forces, contributing to the overall security and stability of the Alliance and its partner nations.
Allied Support and Procurement Agency
Others
Mediation and Arbitration Council
Special Rapporteur on Minority Affairs
Funding
The Global ACES program relies on member state contributions, including funding from the Allied Development Fund (ADF), which operates under the ACES Interbank Consortium. The ADF receives financial support outside the ACES budget, with member states contributing based on specific shares or "keys" determined through negotiations. These keys reflect individual states' interests and incentivize high performance.
The ADF's funding structure enables faster and more flexible provision of funds, enhancing efficiency in addressing development challenges. By using distinct contribution keys, separate from the ACES budget, the ADF ensures that resources are allocated according to member states' interests and contributions, maximizing the impact of its initiatives. The ADF and the Global ACES program aim to incentivize member states, promote optimal performance, and expedite fund disbursement. This approach recognizes and rewards countries that demonstrate exemplary commitment while ensuring accessible financial support for development projects aligned with program objectives.
Sound financial management, transparency, and accountability are prioritized within the ADF and the Global ACES program. Regular financial reporting, audits, and oversight mechanisms guarantee responsible fund utilization and adherence to agreed contribution shares.
Membership
Criteria
The eligibility criteria for participation in the Global ACES program closely align with the requirements for ACES membership as stipulated in the Central Ecrosian Treaty. These criteria serve as the basis for evaluating potential participants and ensuring a consistent standard across the Alliance and its global partnerships. The criteria for membership in the Global ACES program are outlined in the Hauptstadt Communiqué, which provides the current set of guidelines. The communiqué begins by describing the program's identity, defining the relationship between the organization and its members, and outlining its fundamental goals:
- "The Global ACES program is a voluntary association of independent sovereign states, each responsible for its own policies, consulting and co-operating in the common interests of their peoples and in the promotion of international understanding and world peace."
The second article highlights the wide-ranging nature of the Global ACES program, bringing together nations of varying economic statuses across different continents and vast oceans. It emphasizes the inclusivity and diversity of the program. The third article asserts that membership in the program is compatible with membership in other international organizations or maintaining a non-aligned status, as long as these affiliations do not compromise the core values and principles outlined in the Central Ecrosian Treaty. The membership rules outline specific requirements for countries seeking to join the Global ACES program. These requirements include:
- Applicant countries must accept and adhere to the fundamental values, principles, and priorities set forth in the Hauptstadt Communiqué, as well as subsequent declarations, protocols, and annexes.
- Applicant countries must demonstrate a strong commitment to democracy, including the conduct of free and fair elections and the presence of representative legislatures. They must also uphold the rule of law, maintain an independent judiciary, promote good governance practices, and ensure the protection of human rights, freedom of expression, and equality of opportunity.
- Applicant countries must be fully independent sovereign states, capable of making autonomous decisions and representing their own national interests.
- Applicant countries are expected to respect and take into account the wishes of their general population regarding membership in the Global ACES program.
Members
Currently, there are six global partners associated with the Alliance of Central Ecrosian States (ACES). The membership categories within the Global ACES program can be broadly classified into two types: full partners and partners in arrears. The distinction between these categories reflects differences in their level of participation and obligations.
- Full partners actively engage in all aspects of the program and have a comprehensive role within ACES. They are required to contribute to the Allied Development Fund, which is facilitated through the ACES Interbank Consortium. Full partners have the opportunity to attend various functions and organs of the Global ACES program, including the annual AGCC summit.
- On the other hand, partners in arrears have a more limited scope of participation. While they can attend most functions and organs of the program, they are not invited to the annual AGCC summit. One significant difference is that partners in arrears are not obligated to make contributions to the Allied Development Fund. Instead, they receive increased assistance and investment from the fund, which can support their development efforts.
The distinction between full partners and partners in arrears serves to differentiate between developed members and developing members within the Global ACES program. It allows for tailored approaches to meet the specific needs and capacities of each member, while promoting collaboration and support among all participants.
| Country | Joined | Type | Free Trade Provisions | International Military Staff | Capital | Population | Currency | Government | Location | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Baltanla
|
DD/MM/YY | Full | Baltanla City | 175,000,000 | Dong | Semi-presidential republic | Ostlandet | See Baltanla in ACES | ||
 Gjorka
|
DD/MM/YY | Full | Gjorka City | 70,410,005 | Pón | Presidential republic | Ostlandet | See Gjorkan in ACES | ||
 Karimun
|
DD/MM/YY | Full | Giovanni | 54,775,500 | Peta | Presidential republic | Northern Ecros | See Karimun in ACES | ||
 Monsilva
|
22 January 1988 | Full | Amking | 50,012,300 | Yupian | Parliamentary republic | Ostlandet | See Monsilva in ACES | ||
 Paleocacher
|
DD/MM/YY | Full | Gardena | 205,000,000 | Selkie | Presidential republic | Ostlandet | See Paleocacher in ACES | ||
 Tumland
|
DD/MM/YY | In arrears | Tum Central | 38,000,000 | Gregoris | Athenian democracy | Southern Ecros | See Tumland in ACES |
Suspension
In cases of serious or persistent violations of the Hauptstadt Communiqué, particularly related to the absence of democratic governance, members of the Global ACES program may face suspension from both the Allied Global Cooperation Council and the Allied Development Fund. The decision to suspend a member is made by the Central Ecrosian Council. During a period of suspension, the affected member is excluded from participation in meetings of Allied leaders and ministers. However, it's important to note that the member remains a part of the organization despite their suspension. This measure serves as a means to address significant violations while allowing for the potential for remedial action and eventual reinstatement.
Withdrawal
Membership in the Global ACES program is entirely voluntary, and member governments retain the freedom to withdraw from the program at any point. While heads of government possess the authority to suspend member states from active participation in the program, there are no provisions within the program for the expulsion of members.
The absence of an expulsion mechanism underscores the principle of sovereign equality among member states. The Global ACES program recognizes that differences and disagreements may arise among members, and the focus remains on fostering dialogue, cooperation, and understanding to address challenges and promote shared goals. The program values inclusivity and the opportunity for constructive engagement, even in the face of differences, thereby allowing for the potential for reconciliation and future collaboration.
.png){kind=link}