OUscepticism

OUscepticism, also spelled OU-scepticism or OUskepticism, refers to the political ideology or sentiment characterized by scepticism or criticism towards the Ostlandet Union (OU), its policies, institutions, and integration process. It is a term often used to describe a range of attitudes and viewpoints held by individuals, political parties, or organizations across the member states of the OU and outside.

OUscepticism emerged in the early 21st century, mainly during 2023 as a response to the growing influence and powers of the OU. It gained momentum during debates over important OU treaties and mainly during the OU military intervention in Ajakanistan, which is considered to be the main driving point of the ideology, like the first major OUsceptic event was the protests against the OU military intervention in Ajakanistan in major OU members during the outbreak of the war. OUsceptics express a variety of concerns and criticisms about the OU. Some argue that the OU undermines national sovereignty and democracy by transferring powers from national governments to supranational institutions. They believe that decisions affecting their countries should be made by elected representatives in their respective national parliaments rather than by bureaucrats in the Council of Ostlandet.

Others criticize the OU's economic policies, arguing that it hampers free trade and imposes burdensome regulations on businesses. They contend that the OU's common agricultural policy and trade barriers create inefficiencies and hinder economic growth. Additionally, some OUsceptics raise concerns about the costs associated with OU membership and the perceived lack of transparency and accountability in OU decision-making.

OUscepticism is not limited to any particular political ideology or geographic region within the OU. It can be found across the political spectrum, from left-wing and right-wing parties to populist movements. Some OUsceptic parties have gained significant electoral support and representation in national parliaments and the Council of Ostlandet, challenging the political establishment and influencing policy debates.

It is important to note that OUscepticism does not necessarily mean advocating for withdrawal from the OU. While some OUsceptics support the idea of leaving the OU altogether, others advocate for a more limited role for the OU or reforms within the existing framework.

The OU itself has acknowledged the presence of OUscepticism and the need for engagement with its critics. It has sought to address some of the concerns raised by OUsceptics through various reforms and policy adjustments. Nevertheless, OUscepticism continues to be a significant force in politics, shaping debates on issues such as national identity, immigration, economic integration, and the future direction of the OU itself.

Terminology

Hard OUscepticism

Hard OUscepticism involves outright rejection of the entire project of Ostlandet political and economic integration and opposition to their country joining or remaining members of the OU. Hard OUsceptics oppose OU membership outright and see the OU as unreformable.

Soft OUscepticism

Soft OUscepticism supports the existence of, or membership of, a form of OU but with opposition to specific OU policies, where a interest of a country and a OU policy don't mix.

In OU member states

Ajakanistan

Opposition towards the Ostlandet Union has been prominent political issue in Ajaki politics ever since it was founded. It faced criticism from the underground democratic opposition for inviting the former Communist regime and further normalising relations with it. The then de facto head of the pro democracy movement Aleksi Norvay condemned the OU in a tweet were he stated "Gjorka, Paleocher and the other democracies in Ostlandet has abandoned Ajakanistans freedom movement". The sentiment changed in 2022 when Vladimir Kareiv, after a majority vote condemning Ajakanistans actions in the Battle of the Romanyan Sea decided to leave the OU. In retaliation for the arrest of Vladimir Kareiv, and the OU regocnizing the Free Council Supreme the Ajaki army would call a direct strike against Gjorka, causing an OU intervention to start. The resulting casualties and destruction was seen as preventable by many Ajaks effected (especially in the east), But the overall national oppinion of the OU had a large spike with over 70% supporting it.

The OU has also been criticized for its inclusion of Zloveshchiy , Occupation and push down of Ajaki sovereignty, granting Cherzia autonomy and undermining Ajaki values and morals.

The main support for Ouscepticism has come from the Post Petrovist A Just Ajakanistan, with it posisition grounded on the belief of protecting Ajakanistan from the apparent brutal Capitalism and exploitation from foreign organisations. Other OUsceptic parties include the Nationalist Initiative with most of its criticism rutting its criticism against Gjorkas occupation of the ethnicly related region of Khoroshiya and the Party for Life and Peace accusing the OU of using Ajakanistan against its well being and destroying the ethics of the people of Ostlandet.

Gjorka

The National Social Party (PSN) is the largest OUsceptic party in Gjorka with the group heavily protesting the founding of the Union (to the point of leaving a minority coalition with Gjorka United). Since joining, leaving the Union has been included in the party manifesto. Alongside the PSN, the Freedom Party is the only other OUsceptic party represented in the National Assembly. Outside of the National Assembly there is several eurosceptic parties including: the Workers Liberation Front, the Gjorkan Valkist Party and Blue Dawn among others.

Within Gjorka's major parties, OUsceptic factions exists despite not being endorsed by the mainstream party. Despite Gjorka United's pro-OU stance, the Wolf Caucus has several prominent OUsceptic members including leader Isaac Meighan. Forward Gjorka' party stance is officially neutral on the OU, with the party saying it has no plans to leave the organization. However, prominent OUsceptic factions exist such as Forward with Socialism who support a reduced role for Gjorka within the OU and protested the OU's role in the military intervention in Ajakanistan. Similarly the Gjorkan Pirate Party supports Gjorka's membership in the OU while opposing the OU's intervention in Ajakanistan. Lastly the Green Party has a solidly pro-OU stance, with the party advocating for an increased role for Gjorka in the OU.

Within Gjorkan society, OUscepticism is not a popular sentiment. In a poll conducted by the Gjorka Times in 2023, they found 68% of respondents supported Gjorka's membership in the OU and a further 51% desired an increased role for Gjorka in the Union. Similarly another poll by the Gjorka Times found 67% of respondents felt the OU's intervention in Ajakanistan was "justified", however it is noteworthy this figure is down from 81% when polled at the start of the intervention.

Monsilva

In Monsilva, OUsepticism (Monsilvan: 东陆怀疑主义) is relatively low. However, the People's New Party is a leading party in hard OUscepticism in Monsilva, as the party claims the union 'hinders Monsilva's economic growth' and 'deteriorates the Monsilvan identity'. The PNP is currently in a political coalition with Monsilva's second-largest party, the Reformed National Party, which itself has soft and hard OUsceptic factions.

Outside of political parties, Monsilva has faced a few OUsceptic movements. Most of these have been related to Monsilva's history of non-intervention in foreign conflict, which has become built into the culture of many Monsilvans. The most recent of these anti-war OUsceptic movements took place during the OU military intervention in Ajakanistan, despite Monsilva not taking part in the intervention itself.

Members of the Imperial Alliance, a far-right political alliance in Monsilva with fairly low representation, are also generally OUsceptic and tend to lean more towards complete exit from the OU, or to become an observer state.

In 2023, OUscepticism saw massive decline after the OU's success in the OU military intervention in Akvatika and the establishment of Shaoyu as a state of Monsilva. Monsilva is currently lead by the Freedom and Democracy Party and the Democratic Coalition, a party and coalition that both strongly support Monsilva's continued membership in the Ostlandet Union.

In Non-OU countries

Reykanes

Reykanes has been known for its neutrality in international politics for a long time till the termination of the Neutrality Act of 1968 in early 2022. It was a movement supported by most. After some referendums, it was decided that Reykanes becomes a observer of the Ostlandet Union. This has lead to some opposition. The two prominent parties are the Nationalist Front and Non-aligned Party, whom both opposed to joining the observer status. They are considered to be hard OUsceptic parties. After conducting a opinion poll in June 2023 about the Ostlandet Union, it has been noted that there has been a rise of OUscepticism in Reykanes since the day when Reykanes became a observer but the numbers still remain low to be a huge factor in the future between Reykanes and the OU and most of it is soft OUscepticism.