Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gospel of Andrew"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{Talkheader}} {{Lyoan}} {{Article history |action1 = GAN |action1date = 17 August 2021 |action1link = |action1result = promoted |action1oldid = |currentstatus =...") |
(→Page review: new section) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{Section sizes}} | {{Section sizes}} | ||
{{WikiProject Creeperopolis|class=GA|importance=Mid}} | {{WikiProject Creeperopolis|class=GA|importance=Mid}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Page review == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Lede inconsistently describes transliteration from Deltinian [[Arabic language|Arabic]] to the [[iberic script]] as transliteration, but uses a slash for going between [[Creeperian script]] and the iberic script. | ||
| + | * I had no idea what a pseudepigraphical text was. MOS:JARGON potentially? (maybe add a definition as a note?) | ||
| + | * "After an attack on various objects in the museum in 1989" this seems like the sort of event that could be linked as a page | ||
| + | |||
| + | rest looks fine. | ||
| + | Not sure how much more you could write about this. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Content 10/10 | ||
| + | MOS 9/10 | ||
| + | Grammar 10/10 | ||
| + | Seems like FA to me | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:MrSpode42|Spode]] ([[User talk:MrSpode42|talk]]) 03:44, 4 August 2024 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:44, 4 August 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gospel of Andrew article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
| Find sources: Google (books⧼Dot-separator⧽news⧼Dot-separator⧽newspapers⧼Dot-separator⧽scholar⧼Dot-separator⧽free images⧼Dot-separator⧽WP refs)⧼Dot-separator⧽FENS⧼Dot-separator⧽JSTOR⧼Dot-separator⧽NYT⧼Dot-separator⧽TWL | |||
 | This article is written in Jackian, which has its own spelling conventions (color, labor, traveled), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of Jackian. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Gospel of Andrew has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||
| ||||
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This page is not a forum for general discussion about your personal opinions about the Gospel of Andrew. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about your personal opinions about the Gospel of Andrew at the Reference desk. |
 |
|
| WikiProject Creeperopolis | (Rated GA-class, Mid-importance) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
{{#assessment:Creeperopolis|GA|Mid}}
Page review
- Lede inconsistently describes transliteration from Deltinian Arabic to the iberic script as transliteration, but uses a slash for going between Creeperian script and the iberic script.
- I had no idea what a pseudepigraphical text was. MOS:JARGON potentially? (maybe add a definition as a note?)
- "After an attack on various objects in the museum in 1989" this seems like the sort of event that could be linked as a page
rest looks fine. Not sure how much more you could write about this.
Content 10/10 MOS 9/10 Grammar 10/10 Seems like FA to me
