Difference between revisions of "Talk:Susla"
(→Worldbuilding Review (partial): new section) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{Section sizes}} | {{Section sizes}} | ||
{{WikiProject Creeperopolis|class=Start|importance=Low}} | {{WikiProject Creeperopolis|class=Start|importance=Low}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Worldbuilding Review (partial) == | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Lede''' | ||
+ | Paragraph #1 - Inaccuracy, Rakeo is not east of Susla. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Etymology''' | ||
+ | Paragraph #1 - When did the name Susla appear? Why is the page “Susla” (or why has it become the predominant way to refer to the island in Jackian?) | ||
+ | Paragraph #2 - Those non latin characters for kinwita don’t render for me. “Some archeologists and historians” and “Other historians” could have balance problems, which side has more academic credibility if anyone? | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Early human settlements''' | ||
+ | Paragraph #1 - Radiocarbon dating, not “radio carbon-dating”, “have been disputed by some archeologists” who? Are they credible? There’s a double however in here. “Some argue” Who? (I know that’s probably my problem/writing for that last bit). | ||
+ | |||
+ | Paragraph #2 - Oral transmission of history is still recording history, might be more accurate to describe them as not having written historical records instead. Otherwise all good. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Susla genocide''' | ||
+ | This section looks fine. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:MrSpode42|Spode]] ([[User talk:MrSpode42|talk]]) 21:12, 9 March 2024 (EST) |
Revision as of 22:12, 9 March 2024
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing Susla and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
Find sources: Google (books⧼Dot-separator⧽news⧼Dot-separator⧽newspapers⧼Dot-separator⧽scholar⧼Dot-separator⧽free images⧼Dot-separator⧽WP refs)⧼Dot-separator⧽FENS⧼Dot-separator⧽JSTOR⧼Dot-separator⧽NYT⧼Dot-separator⧽TWL |
The Arbitration Committee has authorized uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on users who edit pages related to Surian politics, including this article. Provided the awareness criteria are met, discretionary sanctions may be used against editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. |
Susla has been listed as a level-5 vital article in Geography. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as Start-Class. |
This article is written in Jackian, which has its own spelling conventions (color, labor, traveled), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of Jackian. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Susla. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Susla at the Reference desk. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
|
WikiProject Creeperopolis | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
{{#assessment:Creeperopolis|Start|Low}}
Worldbuilding Review (partial)
Lede Paragraph #1 - Inaccuracy, Rakeo is not east of Susla.
Etymology Paragraph #1 - When did the name Susla appear? Why is the page “Susla” (or why has it become the predominant way to refer to the island in Jackian?) Paragraph #2 - Those non latin characters for kinwita don’t render for me. “Some archeologists and historians” and “Other historians” could have balance problems, which side has more academic credibility if anyone?
Early human settlements Paragraph #1 - Radiocarbon dating, not “radio carbon-dating”, “have been disputed by some archeologists” who? Are they credible? There’s a double however in here. “Some argue” Who? (I know that’s probably my problem/writing for that last bit).
Paragraph #2 - Oral transmission of history is still recording history, might be more accurate to describe them as not having written historical records instead. Otherwise all good.
Susla genocide This section looks fine.
- Wikipedia pages under discretionary sanctions
- All Wikipedia vital articles
- All Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- All Wikipedia vital articles in Geography
- All Wikipedia Start-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Geography
- Wikipedia Start-Class vital articles in Geography
- Wikipedia Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia articles that use Jackian
- Start-Class Creeperopolis articles
- Low-importance Creeperopolis articles