Difference between revisions of "Talk:Federation of Conservative Nations"

From The League Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Talkheader}}
 
{{Talkheader}}
 
{{WikiProject LCN|class=A|importance=high}}
 
{{WikiProject LCN|class=A|importance=high}}
 +
 +
== Maybe move controversial history to a separate "Controversies" section ==
 +
 +
Subjects like the APVF allegations from NSToday, or the destruction of the FCN discord server feel out of place in the history section but are notable- Maybe there should be a controversies section?
 +
 +
Also, a lot of statements made in the article are labeled "citation needed"- I don't think we can get citations for many of those statements, and the use of "citation needed" for comedic effect should be avoided.

Revision as of 12:27, 2 July 2022

WikiProject LCN (Rated A-class, High-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject LCN, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The League of Conservative Nations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
A-Class article A  This article has been rated as A-Class on the project's quality scale.
 High  This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

{{#assessment:LCN|A|High}}

Maybe move controversial history to a separate "Controversies" section

Subjects like the APVF allegations from NSToday, or the destruction of the FCN discord server feel out of place in the history section but are notable- Maybe there should be a controversies section?

Also, a lot of statements made in the article are labeled "citation needed"- I don't think we can get citations for many of those statements, and the use of "citation needed" for comedic effect should be avoided.