Difference between revisions of "Talk:Federation of Conservative Nations"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Terranihil (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | {{Talkheader}} | ||
{{WikiProject LCN|class=A|importance=high}} | {{WikiProject LCN|class=A|importance=high}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Maybe move controversial history to a separate "Controversies" section == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Subjects like the APVF allegations from NSToday, or the destruction of the FCN discord server feel out of place in the history section but are notable- Maybe there should be a controversies section? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also, a lot of statements made in the article are labeled "citation needed"- I don't think we can get citations for many of those statements, and the use of "citation needed" for comedic effect should be avoided. |
Revision as of 12:27, 2 July 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Federation of Conservative Nations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
Find sources: Google (books⧼Dot-separator⧽news⧼Dot-separator⧽newspapers⧼Dot-separator⧽scholar⧼Dot-separator⧽free images⧼Dot-separator⧽WP refs)⧼Dot-separator⧽FENS⧼Dot-separator⧽JSTOR⧼Dot-separator⧽NYT⧼Dot-separator⧽TWL |
WikiProject LCN | (Rated A-class, High-importance) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
{{#assessment:LCN|A|High}}
Maybe move controversial history to a separate "Controversies" section
Subjects like the APVF allegations from NSToday, or the destruction of the FCN discord server feel out of place in the history section but are notable- Maybe there should be a controversies section?
Also, a lot of statements made in the article are labeled "citation needed"- I don't think we can get citations for many of those statements, and the use of "citation needed" for comedic effect should be avoided.