Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creeperian annexation of Navidad and San Juan Diego"

Revision as of 19:18, 1 November 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Creeperian annexation of Navidad and San Juan Diego article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ).
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books⧼Dot-separator⧽news⧼Dot-separator⧽newspapers⧼Dot-separator⧽scholar⧼Dot-separator⧽free images⧼Dot-separator⧽WP refs)⧼Dot-separator⧽FENS⧼Dot-separator⧽JSTOR⧼Dot-separator⧽NYT⧼Dot-separator⧽TWL

The Arbitration Committee has authorized uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on users who edit pages related to Surian politics, including this article.

Provided the awareness criteria are met, discretionary sanctions may be used against editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.

Creeperian annexation of Navidad and San Juan Diego has been listed as a level-5 vital article in Politics. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as A-Class.

Creeperian annexation of Navidad and San Juan Diego has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 22, 2022	Peer review	Reviewed
October 23, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed
October 31, 2022	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

Current status: Good article

This article is written in Jackian, which has its own spelling conventions (color, labor, traveled), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of Jackian. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about the Creeperian annexation of Navidad and San Juan Diego. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about the Creeperian annexation of Navidad and San Juan Diego at the Reference desk.

This page has previously been nominated to be moved. Before re-nominating, review the move requests listed below.

RM, Creeperian annexation of Sequoyan territory → Creeperian annexation of Navidad and San Juan Diego, Moved, 31 October 2022

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Section sizes

Section size for Creeperian annexation of Navidad and San Juan Diego (26 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Cume
_LEAD_	4,564	4,564
Background	18	8,685
Historical Creeperian territories	2,549	2,549
CODECO military occupation	3,493	3,493
1 June Agreement	2,625	2,625
Electoral process	2,644	2,644
Party positions	4,233	4,233
Opinion polling	2,544	21,492
Arapaho	5,082	5,082
Eastern Sequoyah	10,185	10,185
Itse Ulagohisdi	3,681	3,681
Results	15	4,728
Arapaho districts	1,710	1,710
Eastern Sequoyah districts	1,754	1,754
Itse Ulagohisdi districts	1,249	1,249
Aftermath of referendums	32	6,549
Announcement of the results	3,364	3,364
Crises in Sequoyah	2,591	2,591
Annexation	562	562
Reactions	17	22,179
After the 1 June Agreement	7,457	7,457
After the referendums	14,705	14,705
See also	212	212
Notes	27	27
References	36	36
External links	624	624
Total	75,973	75,973

WikiProject Creeperopolis

(Rated A-class, High-importance)

	v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creeperopolis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creeperopolis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
A	This article has been rated as A-Class on the project's quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

skugs deserve the deltinian treatment

eu odeio skugs. eu odeio skugs. eu odeio skugs. eu odeio skugs. eu odeio skugs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.90.12 (talk) 13:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 {{Section sizes}}
 {{WikiProject Creeperopolis|class=A|importance=High}}
+== skugs deserve the deltinian treatment ==
+eu odeio skugs. eu odeio skugs. eu odeio skugs. eu odeio skugs. eu odeio skugs. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/129.234.90.12|129.234.90.12]] ([[User talk:129.212.68.90#top|talk]]) 13:25, 1 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creeperian annexation of Navidad and San Juan Diego"

Revision as of 19:18, 1 November 2022

skugs deserve the deltinian treatment

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Terraconserva

Tools