Talk:Salim VI bin Abu Arshad
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Salim VI bin Abu Arshad redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
Find sources: Google (books⧼Dot-separator⧽news⧼Dot-separator⧽newspapers⧼Dot-separator⧽scholar⧼Dot-separator⧽free images⧼Dot-separator⧽WP refs)⧼Dot-separator⧽FENS⧼Dot-separator⧽JSTOR⧼Dot-separator⧽NYT⧼Dot-separator⧽TWL |
Salim VI bin Abu Arshad has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||
|
Salim VI bin Abu Arshad has been listed as a level-5 vital article in History. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as GA-Class. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Salim VI of Deltino. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this redirect. You may wish to ask factual questions about Salim VI of Deltino at the Reference desk. |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This redirect is written in Jackian, which has its own spelling conventions (color, labor, traveled), and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of Jackian. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
|
WikiProject Creeperopolis | (Rated GA-class, High-importance) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
{{#assessment:Creeperopolis|GA|High}}
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs
- History good articles
- All Wikipedia vital articles
- All Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- All Wikipedia vital articles in History
- All Wikipedia GA-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in History
- Wikipedia GA-Class vital articles in History
- Wikipedia GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Articles with invalid date parameter in template
- Wikipedia articles that use Jackian
- GA-Class Creeperopolis articles
- High-importance Creeperopolis articles