Difference between revisions of "Talk:Federation of Conservative Nations"
(→Section contains uncitable material: new section) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talkheader}} | {{Talkheader}} | ||
| − | {{WikiProject LCN|class= | + | {{WikiProject LCN|class=Start|importance=high}} |
== Maybe move controversial history to a separate "Controversies" section == | == Maybe move controversial history to a separate "Controversies" section == | ||
Revision as of 18:52, 4 July 2022
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Federation of Conservative Nations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|||
| Article policies
|
||
| Find sources: Google (books⧼Dot-separator⧽news⧼Dot-separator⧽newspapers⧼Dot-separator⧽scholar⧼Dot-separator⧽free images⧼Dot-separator⧽WP refs)⧼Dot-separator⧽FENS⧼Dot-separator⧽JSTOR⧼Dot-separator⧽NYT⧼Dot-separator⧽TWL | |||
| WikiProject LCN | (Rated Start-class, High-importance) | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
{{#assessment:LCN|Start|High}}
Maybe move controversial history to a separate "Controversies" section
Subjects like the APVF allegations from NSToday, or the destruction of the FCN discord server feel out of place in the history section but are notable- Maybe there should be a controversies section?
Also, a lot of statements made in the article are labeled "citation needed"- I don't think we can get citations for many of those statements, and the use of "citation needed" for comedic effect should be avoided.
Section contains uncitable material
One of the sections contains a passage describing the following event "Following a confrontation between Gagium and Dragons of Power in which Gagium repeatedly threatened to engage in sexual intercourse with Dragon's girlfriend"- But this occurred off of NationStates, and therefore cannot be cited in any really publicly viewable format. Considering that Gagium himself wrote it, I think it could be attributed to Gagium as a quote, but honestly maybe it should just be removed.
